User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/2009/June

Vandalism of The King's School, Chester page.

Basically, a friend of mine worked out my password, and then wanted to see what would happen if she put in something juvenile and irrelevant on our school's website. I apologise for the inconvenience, however please understand I did not make that edit. Is there anyway I could perhaps be removed from the history of that page? I don't like my account, from which it is obvious to work out who I am, having vandalised my school's website. Thanks for any help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GSheen (talk • contribs) 17:37, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Not vandalism

If you look at the original article some one keeps deleting the references like "From Paekchae of Korea to the origin of Yamato Japan" and Korea and Japan, study of East Asia. The translation of Paekche annal and anything that refutes the discredited quotes from Nihon shoki. Some one is trying to push a old theory from the 1900s that have all been discredited. And they keep deleting the current references and books. After a couple of reverts I think the only solution is to refer people to the books and not try to make or push weird theories. --71.231.32.133 (talk) 18:51, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Article on ClueBot?

I, for one, would love to read a well-written article about how this amazing little thing works, in laymans terms. How can it tell vandalism from other edits so well? Chrisrus (talk) 06:39, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

changing from gzhao to georgezhao

hi, how are you doing? i am requesting to change from user:gzhao to user:georgezhao, i am a user from other language wiki, not contribute more in en wiki. but i want to manage my global accounts by user:georgezhao, i also want to learn more about en wiki, please support me to change. thanks so much. Gzhao (talk) 20:33, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Your removal of my apparent edit of the article on the Queen

I made no such edit, so I don't know why I've been warned for writing an obscenity. First, I don't swear, secondly, I revere the Queen, and thirdly, I don't have a Wikipedia account, so why you thought it was me, I don't know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.149.53.226 (talk) 15:53, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Someone using your computer did, as indicated by your edit history, on May 6th. If you are using a shared computer, the person who added the content may not have been you, but another user. Please consider creating an account if yuo wish to edit. just a little insignificant 16:51, 1 June 2009

(UTC)

Not necesserily the same computer, but someone a diffent newtwork with the same IP address. It happened to me too.--10000 Walls (talk) 10:21, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Yet another barnstar

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For the bot with a clue. :-) I dream of horses (talk) 15:39, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

new rule?

Hi, I found that http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=President_of_Sri_Lanka&diff=294784186&oldid=291938381 was not reverted, to my surprise. Maybe you want to add a rule for that Jasy jatere (talk) 17:48, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

why did you change my edit to beethoven? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.2.194.130 (talk) 18:12, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

CBFPHowto images

As used on the User:ClueBot/FalsePositives page

I note that these images have page titles blurred, presumably to establish some level of anonymity in the example you have used for illustration. You may want to consider blurring them a bit more, if you really want to hide what they say (since they are currently still readable with a little effort). Further, the fourth numbered image contains the full information contained in the blurred titles of the other images, but as clear and plain text in the pictured edit box.

Of course, if the blurring of titles is merely an aesthetic choice (rather than a wish to obscure the exact details of your example) then you can ignore this comment of mine completely. :-)

-Stelio (talk) 22:18, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

I just blurred it out to deflect users away from the exact page, and give the idea that the page they should go to is not Great Sankey High School or User talk:172.207.93.175, but the page that is relevant to their report. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 00:54, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Question

I need you to respond immediately when you can, please. There is a map of the United States that shows the obesity growth from 1985-2006. Can you please get that same chart with it moving all the way to 2009? Thank you. Bob.--76.217.111.184 (talk) 02:24, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Well, this really wouldn't be the place to ask. You might want to ask at the reference desk. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:24, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Sai Baba

I never removed the Criticism section in any of the few edits I made as you claim, so please change your "reason for edit" thank you. Sbs108 (talk) 21:30, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

sorry, my mistake I thought you were accusing me of removing the criticism sections.Sbs108 (talk) 21:36, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi ClueBot !

           I am unable to modify the Mantissa article , so how to resolve it plz help me ...

Thanks ,

Thangavel —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thangavel soft (talk • contribs) 16:14, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey

Sorry dude, thought it was a test. 86.155.117.230 (talk) 18:09, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Chicken

Don't know, but to me it looks like the revert by ClueBot (727180) didn't work very well. Anyway, I can't read the page about Chicken. 83.248.182.38 (talk) 14:08, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Bug - Template talk:2009 flu pandemic table

The automatic archiving of above talk page (resp. its predecessor before changing the template's name) seems just to delete old threads, the archive page to which they are claimed to be moved contains no threads. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 21:04, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Not clearing WP:SCV redlinks

Hi, ClueBot II hasn't been clearing out the redlinks from Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations since this edit on the 18th. It was incredibly useful and made our jobs a lot easier; I'd be grateful if we could get this function back! There was some trouble with CorenSearchBot due to the API a while ago, not sure if the two are related... Regards, – Toon^(talk) 15:43, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Removing old warnings

Is this intentional? It makes sense for old warnings to be removed, but the bot also removed a sharedip notice and warnings that were not that old (from this month). This should probably be fixed (at least the sharedip notice removal). Rami R 12:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

It wasn't intentional. The API probably returned a blank response for whatever reason. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 12:35, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi! My name is C.Freddie! I like it here! C.Fred^e (talk) 14:03, 26 June 2009 (UTC)