Clsc
FIY
editYou are welcome to leave me a message here. Thank you in advance. When read, your message will be deleted unless a response is required. For that reason this page is mostly blank. There is no need to greet me "Welcome to Wikipedia" as I've been around since before 2006 when I made this account.
Don't worry: The article as it stands now has been thoroughly refocused to an encyclopedic topic. I can't imagine anyone's going to delete it now, and the votes (including a statement from the nominator (that's me!) reflect that. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:48, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 13 December
editHello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Magdalensberg page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- Done. (last year). clsc (talk) 01:21, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Pentimal
editDid you read the "Roman numerals" article? VIIII was actually more common than IX in Roman times, and IIII is used on many clock and watch faces or dials down to the present day... AnonMoos (talk) 02:12, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- I have thought about that edit, as my wording was unfortunate. Thanks for reminding me, as I later forgot again. I intended to write that the counting system in question had only symbols for "digit and palm", that is: one ("I": Roman "I") and five ("U": Roman "V"). Unlike the Roman system which also had a symbol for ten ("X"), and more. PS: Perhaps you're right, I have not counted all numbers using Roman numerals, and hence have no frequency statistic. That still leaves the question: Is "frequent" equal to "correct, proper", or just "frequent"? Your link above goes to the section "Alternative forms", as you knew, but you still disguised it omitting the "Alternative forms" from the link text. I find that funny, not offensive, so this remark is tongue-in-cheek: but then I'm Norse, not Roman :) clsc (talk) 01:18, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- I just added what I originally intended, I think/hope you will find it acceptable :) clsc (talk) 01:35, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Clsc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Clsc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Clsc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)