Clisntover

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The show is over, and barring any solid announcement of renewal will stay that way. Your attacks only serve to undermine your position, and your source does not support the claims you are making. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 06:55, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

You're only crying because you know you're wrong and you're scared to confess it. Clisntover (talk) 04:01, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

More likely you're far too stubborn to admit that you're wrong, seeing as how your document does not in any way state that a new series is coming. You know this and have admitted it in the edit summaries, which means you're editing just to be disruptive/ You'll be reported for vandalism if this keeps up. You want to prove your case, find a source that actually proves it. Otherwise, stop wasting time. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 09:40, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 09:40, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 18:36, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. You know full well your source does not support a fifth season being made, and have admitted such. You get reported next time. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 06:48, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

you just hate code lyoko and hate to see the fact that it ISNT over. you need to back off Clisntover (talk) 21:09, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Code Lyoko, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ETLamborghini (talk) 21:40, 23 January 2010 (UTC) I DID.Clisntover (talk) 21:56, 23 January 2010 (UTC) I DID. Clisntover (talk) 21:57, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit-warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:33, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

You are blocked for edit-warring- in the future, please wait to make controversial edits until you have consensus on the article talk page. In addition, I've reviewed this source and I can't find anything that says that more episodes are planned. That source offers four seasons of "Code Lyoko," and says that its future plans include an online game: I don't see any upcoming episodes mentioned. What page of the pdf discusses the next group of episodes? I'm open to the possibility that I just didn't see it. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:33, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for immediately resuming edit-war as soon as previous block expired. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:03, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Not cool. Now that you fully understand that Wikipedia requires consensus, you are expected to discuss your changes on the talk page and seek consensus- not jump back into the same edit war, complete with uncivil edit summary. In addition, at this point you have been introduced to the concept of reliable sources, and must know that an image of an unattributed email is not a reliable source. What's the hurry? If you are correct, there will be reliable sources soon enough, and then other users will agree with you that the change should be made. Remember, when your block expires again: don't make any controversial changes to the article until you have consensus on the talk page that they should be made. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:03, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

tehres no point in consenus!!! this guy wont listen! he just hates code lyoko and is abusing his editing privleges Clisntover (talk) 06:18, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Your block ends and the first thing you do is reinsert the controversial edit yet again. This is getting disruptive. Since you have been repeatedly warned about this, told what to do instead and even blocked twice, I've blocked you again; this time you have a week off from Wikipedia editing, in the hope that you'll read some of our policy pages about consensus building. You should note that the next block, should one be needed, will be considerably longer than a week. ⇦REDVERS⇨ 08:52, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Your claim that 'he hates code lyoko' makes zero sense in this situation. You have not yet offered any reliable sources confirming your assertion. The source you keep adding doesn't say what you claim it says. It's not an abuse of editing privileges to remove information that is not sourced and may not be correct. I know that you'd really, really like for your favorite TV show to have another season. I'd like another season of "Buffy the Vampire Slayer." But we both have to accept that wishing doesn't make it so. If it really happens, then you'll have real sources and be able to add it. Right now, it doesn't look like there's any information available. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:09, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sym-Bionic Titan

The article Sym-Bionic Titan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

So far, there's only a weak claim to notability through who is making this series but nothing to prove the series does exist or will ever do so beyond some crystal balling supposition.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. baa! _radda 12:51, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Backstory

Please stop adding the long backstory to the plot section. It isn't part of the main plot. The main plot, as outlined, if the kids fighting Xana in a virtual world. The stuff about Xana's purpose and creation all that isn't part of that, just a backstory for the characters in question.

Also, please stop edit warring. Read Bold, Revert, Discuss. You've already been blocked repeatedly for refusing to stop, and the blocks are only going to get longer. You aren't always going to get your way. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 05:18, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

We get it. You hate Code Lyoko. That's fine. Stop editing the articles and it's all good. Just because you hate it doesn't mean you can try to sabotage the article to make it lesser quality like you constantly do, and denying the fact that the series is not ended, Clisntover (talk) 04:54, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

You may wish to know there a sockpuppet investigation about your behavior. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 14:45, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 20:14, 27 March 2010 (UTC))
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.