User talk:Climie.ca/Archive 6

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

→

Archive 10

Operation Tractable

In regards to basic MoS, I don't see anything wrong with it. The prose looks good, although they always find something to improve during the FAC. :) JonCatalán^(Talk) 04:05, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue XXXI (September 2008)
Project news The sixth project coordinator election has now concluded. The following editors have been elected to serve as project coordinators until 31 March 2009: Bedford, Cam, Eurocopter, JonCatalán, MBK004, Nick Dowling, Roger Davies (lead), TomStar81, and Woody. Kirill Lokshin has been appointed coordinator emeritus for as long he wants the position. Congratulations to those elected, and thanks to everyone who participated! Following a successful RfA, Buckshot06 has been promoted to administrator. We wish him every success in his new role!	Articles of note New featured articles: AMX-30E Battle of Goliad Guadalcanal Campaign Harry Murray Morotai Mutiny Phan Xich Long New featured lists: List of Indian Mutiny Victoria Cross recipients List of Zulu War Victoria Cross recipients‎ New featured topics: Guadalcanal Campaign New A-Class articles: 2nd Canadian Infantry Division Air Combat Group RAAF Battle of Berlin Blair Anderson Wark Late Roman army Operation Lüttich SMS Von der Tann SS Minnesotan SS Montanan SS Ohioan (1914) SS Panaman SS Washingtonian USS Iowa (BB-61) USS West Bridge (ID-2888)
Current proposals and discussions The W1.0 Editorial Team have selected 1133 Military history articles for inclusion in the W0.7 test release. For convenience, these are broken by task force and you'll find a list on each task force headed "Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for [task force name]" on the task force talk page. You may nominate extra articles for inclusion or existing ones for removal. If you can improve any of the articles on the list, by adding references, or copy-editing, or cleaning up generally, please do so. A new discussion has started about naming articles on Soviet WWII operations. All contributions are welcome as we hope to resolve this longstanding issue once and for all. The debate over whether Milhist should adopt C-Class is continuing. All comments and suggestions are welcome.
Awards and honors Bellhalla has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his exemplary work on military history articles and DYK entries. For their work improving articles through the Military history review process, Borg Sphere, Cla68, Eurocopter, Nick Dowling, TomStar81, Woody, JonCatalán, Brad and Cam, have been awarded the Content Review Medal. The Contest department has completed its eighteenth month of competition, which saw 45 entries. The top scorer this month is Bellhalla with a record 151 points, followed by Abraham, B.S. with 27 points. Woody, Cam, YellowMonkey, Piotrus, David Underdown, Borg Sphere, Tartarus, Ed!, and Out also fielded entries. Bellhalla is now the overall leader, with 300 points in total. The Chevrons go to Bellhalla and Abraham, B.S. gets the Writer's Barnstar. You are encouraged to submit any articles you are working on as entries.
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:47, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

GA Reviews

Hey Cam. I was looking over 13th Airborne Division and 17th Airborne Division to see whether I could nom for a Good Topic (I can't, but thats another thing I guess), and I looked at their GA Reviews, and I can't say I'm entirely happy with them. They were done by Redmarkviolinist, and they seem a little on the short side, and a bit too ready to be passed. I reckon that they are GA-Class, but I want to be double-sure to feel like I deserve them. Should I put them up for GAR, or find someone to give them a look over? Thanks for the help, I know that you're busy, Skinny87 (talk) 07:40, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

FYI

Enigma has rightly pointed out to me that I've made a mistake on the Op Totalise/Tractable map :( I'll upload a corrected version asap. EyeSerene^talk 17:32, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

OK, that's now fixed, and I've altered the SS counterattacks map to show Canadian national flags instead of the military ones (mainly for clarity and consistency with other maps). EyeSerene^talk 17:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Chevrons+

I'm speechless, and truly grateful. Thank you! EyeSerene^talk 16:52, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Milhist Assessment of Frederick III, German Emperor

Hey, thanks for your comment on the wikiproject milhist review of Frederick III, German Emperor. I expanded the intro as you said and was wondering if you could look it over and let me know if there's anything else I can fix about it, as I know its not perfect. The assessment page where I talk about what I did is here. Thanks if you can help. --Banime (talk) 20:09, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

102d SS Hvy. Pz. Batl.

Reynold's, Sons of the Reich: II SS Panzer Corps, has information interspersed throughout the book, including strengths and losses during specific battles (such as at Hill 112). I'll have to look in other books, including Panzer Tactics (which unfortunate has no index), but I don't think I have much on the SS, unfortunately. JonCatalán^(Talk) 01:58, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

Hey Cam. Thanks very much for the Barnstar, but I don't think I deserve it. I didn't do any copy-editing to the article - I checked my contributions and I don't think I ever edited Tractable. I only participated in the FAC. I'm glad it got passed to FA-Class, but looking through the history of the article, perhaps you got me mistaken with User:Dabomb87, who did some copy-editing?

However, though I don't deserve one, you certainly do, for all the help you've given to me, so here we go:

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		To Cam, for all the help given to me with my articles, and putting up with a dozen different questions! Skinny87 (talk) 08:15, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Aha, I see. Thanks for the barnstar Cam. Much appreciated! Skinny87 (talk) 18:08, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Op Tractable

Congratulations on another well-deserved FA ;) EyeSerene^talk 11:14, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your gracious award, and congratulations on your new featured article! JonCatalán^(Talk) 19:54, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Possibility of a collaboration

Hey, Cla68, I'm wondering if you'd be interested in considering a collaboration on the articles about Japanese carriers & battleships? Cam ^(Chat) 23:51, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. Look forward to it. Please edit away and I'll try to help out later. The Yamato-related articles need some work and they get a lot of views, so it was in that area that I probably was going to start working next, but it will be a few months probably before I get to it.

By the way, I recently acquired some Japanese picture books about IJN aircraft carriers and Yamato class battleships which contain some pictures that I've never seen before, and may not be widely available, or available at all, outside Japan. Subject to when I have spare time, I'm going to start scanning and uploading these pictures to Commons and linking them to image galleries for the different ships. Cla68 (talk) 00:12, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

I'll try to get some of the Yamato images uploaded soon. Some especially interesting ones are from the original engineering plans and blueprints, some in color, of the ship's design and construction. Cla68 (talk) 03:34, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

By the way, which books/sources were you going to utilize for Yamato? Cla68 (talk) 03:40, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Looks good. I have Peattie and Evans' Kaigun, Skulski's Battleship Yamato, Dull's Battle History, and Hansgeorg and Jung, Dieter and Mickel, Peter Jentschura's Warships of the Imperial Japanese Navy. Cla68 (talk) 03:52, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

One more thing, there's a message board, if you're interested, devoted to the IJN. It's here and is operated by Anthony Tully, one of the authors of Shattered Sword. It has a small group of posters, but most of them are extremely knowledgeable about the IJN and post some interesting facts, details, and sources I wouldn't have otherwise known about, such as in this thread. Cla68 (talk) 07:04, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Re Canadian flag/ensign

Comment on my talk page: User talk:EyeSerene#Canadian Red Ensign vs. National Flag Your opinion? EyeSerene^talk 07:37, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Okies, I'll change both images (when I get round to it...!) EyeSerene^talk 18:55, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Operation Tractable

Operation Tractable appears as a selected article on theCanada Portal. Congratulations and thank you to the editors of the articles that appear in the portal. A selected Canadian article should be well-written and interesting. As a selected article it showcases and promotes finer Canadian content and as such should encourage contribution of Canadian related articles. An excerpt from this article regularly appears on the Portal's main page, it is randomly appearing article Portal:Canada/Selected article/36 .SriMesh | talk 03:13, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback, User:Knowzilla/New Rollbacks School and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck. Also see the current discussion at WT:MHCOORD#Attention!. -MBK₀₀₄ 04:14, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Re:USS New Jersey question

The Milhist MoS has a section named "pronouns", the "she/it" issue is addressed there. TomStar81 (Talk) 06:10, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank You!

		The WikiChevrons
		For service above and beyond the call of duty as part of Operation Silent Sentry, the October 15, 2008, effort to keep the mainpage article USS New Jersey (BB-62) vandal free and address any talkpage related question, I herby present you with The WikiChevrons. Semper Fi! TomStar81 (Talk) 00:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

11th Airborne Division

Hey. I intend to get 11th Airborne Division (United States) to FA-Class even if it kills me. Therefore, I've set up a new MILHIST peer review for the article, which can be accessed via the talkpage. Any comments, especially on the prose, would be a real help if you have the time. Cheers! Skinny87 (talk) 17:45, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for fixing the bits on my userpage. Much appreciated! Skinny87 (talk) 08:02, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

W0.7

Gentle nag? :))) --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 15:15, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

[Chuckle] Indeed. As you'll have noticed I've broken up the ranges to make them a bit less daunting. All we need do now is get a few people working on them. I do appreciate you heroically soldiering on :) 05:57, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks very much. I'm going to start processing the links etc for the completed checklists. We may not finish it all in time but at least we'll get some of it done. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 05:58, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Oil shale extraction

Hi, Climie. As you are a member of the FA-Team, I would like to ask you assistance. The Oil shale extraction was a FAC, but was not promoted, mostly because of the prose. I wonder if you could be interested to help bringing this article to the FA level. Thank you in advance. Beagel (talk) 20:39, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

11th ABN MoS

Sorry, got to dash to class in a sec. Could you give 11th ABN a quick MoS check before I submit it to FAC today or tomorrow? Cheers mate, Skinny87 (talk) 12:51, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Yamato

I added a lot of design detail to the Yamato article, then realized it probably should go in the Yamato-class battleship article instead. I don't want to screw up your work there, so if you'd like to find a way to include it somehow, please copy it over. Cla68 (talk) 08:04, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Actually, I feel like I'm screwing up your writing on those articles by trying to add material at the same time that you're building them. I think I'm going to wait until you're finished adding the information from the sources you have, then I'll add additional detail, if needed, from the sources I have. Cla68 (talk) 22:29, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Adopt me, PLEASE!!!

Hi there Cam, I recently joined Wikipedia and only discovered Wikipedia Adoption earlier today. I would dearly love to be adopted and you seem to be my best bet. I'm on Wikipedia every day from around 3:00p.m. to 9:00p.m. Thank you! TopGearFreak (talk) 17:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Tractable

Hello Cam, I've been dropping in on 'Tractable' since I read Read's book on Totalise. I like the detail in it now but if I might be permitted a quibble I don't know of a '11th SS Pz Div'. Could this be a typo? Keith-264 (talk) 10:31, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Heads up

You may wish to comment here. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 06:23, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

If you have a moment, would you mind please looking at this and, if you think a clear winner has emerged, closing it and awarding the applicable barnstar? (incidentally, you should start thinking about adminship. It's almost long overdue.) Thanks, --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 06:37, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks very much, Cam. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 07:10, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Iowa class FT

I assume you've got the working group page watchlisted. If not, here's the link again: User:TomStar81/Iowa class battleship featured topic work group. I plan on undoing the talk page redirect to facilitate work on this. I'll have my response done there within 30 minutes. Also, like what Roger has said above, when you're ready for +sysop let me know and I'll gladly offer a co-nom for you (I assume that Roger would as well), like I did for Tom. -MBK₀₀₄ 02:19, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

You already missed it. I replied here: User talk:TomStar81/Iowa class battleship featured topic work group two minutes before you posted to my talk page the second time. -MBK₀₀₄ 02:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Um, not be like...mean, or anything, but from what I have read TomStar81 did say he would return, and the tone of your messages suggests that you do not belive he will. I am certain that Tom won't leave completely, it is obvious that wikipedia and the military project means a lot to him and I am quite sure that he will find his way back in time. Also, I was wondering why the Obama article was not within the military project's scope when McCain is. I meant to ask MBK, but I can not edit his page for some reason, so I was hoping you could pass that along to him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.31.27.143 (talk) 07:24, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Well, that wasn't the way I was intending to sound. Optimistically, Tom will return. I would prefer for Tom to return (and am in no way suggesting that I am in any way shape or form glad that he's gone. It strikes a massive blow both the project and the coordination team), and hope that he eventually will. That said, the project he's devoted most of his wikitime to (The Iowa Class) should not be allowed to be mothballed while he is gone. MBK004 and I are of the opinion that the work needs to continue despite Tom's sudden departure. Did the American guerillas in the Philippines give up when McArther left the island? Nope. Did McArther promise to return? Yes. Did he? Yes. The principle remains the same (just less lethal). Cam ^(Chat) 07:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Re Tom etc

Yes, I had noticed, and left a note on his talk page. ATB, EyeSerene^talk 08:55, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

PS Just seen Roger's comment above re Adminship, and fully agree - when you decide the time is right, I'd be honoured to co-nom. Let me know ;) EyeSerene^talk 09:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

One or two regiments?

Is the Essex Scottish Regiment the same as The Essex Scottish Regiment? Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 22:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I made Essex Scottish Regiment a redirect. And you are not the only person to do something like that (I did it with some airports that are military bases). CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 00:31, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Questions from TGF

Hi Cam. I was wondering how to achive my page and I came across the Cluebot III page, which tells you how to archive your talk page. I tried to follow the instructions but couldn't understand them. Can you give me a simplified version on how to archive my page? Thanks, TopGearFreak ^Talk 17:21, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

From TGF

		Sick of Cookies? I know I am! That's why I gave you a virtual Oreo!!
		Thanks for telling me how to archive my Talk Page. I don't understand a word in Wikipedia's article on it! TopGearFreak Talk 16:46, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Can I use Image:Hannover7908.jpg on my UserPage? I found it on Wikimedia Commons but in the Fact Box underneath it says it has a special kind of licence and I'm not sure if I can use it. Best, TopGearFreak ^Talk 17:03, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

No, check that last question. I asked Roux. It's OK. Thanks anyway, TopGearFreak ^Talk 21:48, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

I signed up to Twinkle, but when I pressed 'xfd' (one of the Twinkle tabs) a message came up that said 'your account is too new to use Twinkle'. How old does my account have to be before I can use Twinkle? Thanks once again, TopGearFreak ^Talk 16:52, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

13th Airborne Division A-Class Review

Hey Cam. I was wondering, if you had the time, you might be able to comment on 13th Airborne Division (United States)'s A-Class Review that I've got running at the moment. You're comments are usually really helpful, so anything would be appreciated. Cheers, Skinny87 (talk) 07:42, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue XXXII (October 2008)
Project news Following a lengthy discussion, three new coordinators – EyeSerene, Maralia and the_ed17 - have been coopted. The purpose of the appointments is partly to fill the place left by the retirement of TomStar81 and partly to provide increased/improved coordinator capacity to cover existing coordinator absences and to help with upcoming major projects. As a reminder, coordinators are merely editors who have committed to go the extra mile for the project and that there are very few processes that require coordinator input. Specifically these are closing A-Class reviews, and endorsing two project award nominations. Any editors who wish to help with the nitty-gritty of this busy project (cross-posting A-Class review, peer review and featured article candidate alerts; responding to member questions and queries, helping with drives) are positively encouraged to do so. A workshop has been set up to redesign and improve the newsletter. In our recent competition, a new name was chosen – The Bugle. All editors are welcome to participate, especially those with graphic and design skills! Administrator and Milhist coordinator, Nick Dowling, has changed his user name to Nick-D.	Articles of note New featured articles: Albert Speer Anglo-Zanzibar War Operation Epsom Operation Tractable SMS Von der Tann TAM USS Nevada (BB-36) New featured lists: List of Knight's Cross recipients of the U-boat service List of New Zealand Land Wars Victoria Cross recipients List of Second Afghan War Victoria Cross recipients New A-Class articles: Admiralty Islands campaign Battle of Fort Donelson Battle of Fort Henry Battle of Vigo Bay Clarence Smith Jeffries Frederick III, German Emperor Gilbert du Motier, marquis de Lafayette MS West Honaker Percy Herbert Cherry Joseph Maxwell SS Iowan Third Battle of Kharkov USS Constitution
Current proposals and discussions Adoption of C-class remains firmly on the Milhist agenda with discussions approaching their fourth month of debate. More views are sought on this.
Awards and honors Kyriakos has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his long and distingushed service as a Coordinator of the Military history WikiProject from February 2007 to September 2008. LordAmeth has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his long and distingushed service as a Coordinator of the Military history WikiProject from August 2006 to September 2008. EyeSerene has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his diligent and excellent copyediting of vast quantities of Military History articles—notably his work on multiple Featured Article Candidates. TomStar81 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of both his long and distinguished service as a coordinator of this project from August 2007 to October 2008, and of his exemplary contributions to articles on the vessels of the U.S. Navy. Bellhalla has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal twice for his six ship-related articles: SS Montanan, SS Ohioan (1914), SS Panaman, MS West Honaker, SS Iowan, and USS West Bridge (ID-2888). Abraham, B.S. has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for his three biographies on Australian First World War Victoria Cross recipients: Percy Herbert Cherry, Blair Anderson Wark, and Joseph Maxwell. The Contest department has completed its nineteenth month of competition, which saw 35 entries. The top scorer this month is the_ed17 with 39 points, followed by Bellhalla with 38 points. David Underdown, Abraham, B.S., Woody, Piotrus, Rosiestep, Tartarus, Gaia Octavia Agrippa and Harland1 also fielded entries. Bellhalla is now the overall leader, with 338 points in total. The Chevrons go to the_ed17 and Bellhalla gets the Writer's Barnstar. You are encouraged to submit any articles you are working on as entries.
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:24, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Howdy, Thanks so much for the Barnstar You didn't need to do that. You know if you need help on something you just need to ask. Thanks and Have A Great Day! Duke R. Oliver I ^{His Duchy} 18:52, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

GA reform redux

I've recently had a chat with a couple of the contributors, and we think it may be worth revisiting the GA reform proposal put together by the working party during the Summer. Since you contributed to the proposal's development, I was wondering if you'd care to comment? I've left a brief recap at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles/Reform#GA reform redux; your input would be much appreciated. Thank you, EyeSerene^talk 13:28, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Review

Hi! Be wary, this message is asking for a favour. ;) I've been nurturing an article, 2008 Nord-Kivu conflict, and I was wondering if I could get some pro help in evaluating and fixing it up (read:reviewing). I'm fairly experienced with formatting and organization, but I figured I'd ask a MILHIST coordinator to assist. So, what do you say? :) Thanks for the consideration! Cheers, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 00:28, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks a metric ton! :) Cheers, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 01:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

No worries, friend. I'm not in any rush. Good luck on the homework! :) Cheers, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 00:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for the barnstar! JonCatalán^(Talk) 16:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Coordinator discussions

It would be helpful to have some input on the following discussions, some of which you may have missed:

• WT:MHCOORD#Task force adoption - Proposal for filling the last three TF coordinator slots

• WT:MHCOORD#Coordinating task forces - Job description re task forces. Some input already but much more welcomed so we can get a summary/checklist in place.

• WT:MHCOORD#C-Class: testing the water - Views welcomed on whether in principle Milhist should adopt C-Class.

• WT:MHCOORD#A-class article reassessment - Finishing touches on getting the reappraisal review in place.

Very many thanks :) --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 09:51, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Greetings

The student Somertime02 is no longer actively editing the article Bone grafting. If I am not mistaking; you had her on your watch list as part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject AP Biology 2008. I wish to thank you for your efforts and regret any inconvenience this may have caused. --JimmyButler (talk) 18:21, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Question on naming conventions

one thing I've never quite been able to figure out with regards to ship naming: We call it USS Iowa, using its official designated name. If that's the case, then why do we call the IJN Yamato the Japanese Battleship Yamato? Seems the former would make more sense than the latter. We don't call it United States Battleship Iowa, so why do we apply it to the Axis-power navies? Cam ^(Chat) 06:01, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

That's been the way it's been done on Wikipedia since before I started editing in late 2005 and I haven't been able to find the original discussion on why it's done that way. I believe the official title for Imperial Japanese Navy ships is, "His Imperial Japanese Majesty's Ship Yamato", which would mean the ship is "HIJMS Yamato". But, I think the argument against this is that the real name is in Japanese, and therefore the "HIJMS" abbreviation is an English-language approximation, and therefore not completely accurate. So, we end up stuck with a generic titile of "Japanese battleship Yamato. I notice that CombinedFleet.com uses "IJN Yamato so perhaps that is the way to go. If so, we should probably bring it up at either the maritime warfare project page or the main MILHIST project talk page. Cla68 (talk) 06:23, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

According to this [1] the IJN didn't use an official prefix for its warships, unlike the USN. So, perhaps that's why we use "Japanese Battleship Yamato". However, I think the official title for each ship is, "Imperial Japanese Navy battleship Yamato" and I don't see why we wouldn't want to abbreviate that in the article titles, even if its our own convention. Cla68 (talk) 01:47, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

By the way, here's another message board with good discussions on the IJN [2]. Cla68 (talk) 02:05, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

13th Airborne Division FAC

Hey Cam. I don't know if you'd be interested, but 13th Airborne Division (United States) is at FAC at the moment; any comments you could give would be greatfully received. Skinny87 (talk) 11:41, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: With thanks

Thank you very much for the barnstar! :-) Kirill ^(prof) 12:48, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks a lot for the suggestions on cannonball jellyfish. --Desert fox2009 (talk) 19:24, 5 December 2008 (UTC)