re Belay Device @ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Belay_device&oldid=935927255 The previous (through 14 Oct 2019) "A variety of belay devices" picture was far more comprehensive, and less of an extended ad campaign for Petzl. Now there are *three* Petzl Reverso images. The page now seems to have an unfair over-representation of one manufacturer, coupled with explicit removal of a multi-vendor image depicting a diversity of devices. Do you work for Petzl ? WordSurd (talk) 17:20, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your efforts modernizing the page. While I understand no bias intended, one subjective view suggests it could come across that way. No intent to diminish Petzl, just prefer seeing many sides. The latest technology is great to add, but I would still note the value of the older image and diversity of devices. Belay was not just invented, and older tech is still valuable for an encyclopedic overview. Not an editor, just my opinion. Glad to see the page kept current :-) WordSurd (talk) 17:36, 15 January 2020 (UTC)