Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf(talk) 17:49, 6 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Clevx (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Not sure why I got blocked. I just published information regarding our EncryptUSB product

Decline reason:

The reason for the block is explained above. You should also review promotional editing, conflict of interest and paid editing as to why what you are attempting to do is problematic. You won't be unblocked to continue to violate those policies by directly editing about your company's products. If you want to be a general, individual contributor and edit about other topics unrelated to your conflict of interest, please tell what those might be. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 19:17, 6 February 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Clevx (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand that we can't add a links to our products. No problem, but just to let you know that our CEO is donating 100$ every year to Wiki (check for donations from lev.bolotin@clevx.com. Pls unblock us so we can edit this page

Decline reason:

Please tell us what topics you will write about if unblocked. Your previous edits were a bit spammy, so we'd like to be reassured that you understand our conflict of interest guideline and will follow the site's terms of use. In particular, you're expected to follow these best practices if you intend to edit topics about which you have a financial or personal stake. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:59, 7 February 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Clevx (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

As I mentioned, I wanted to update list of encryption softwares with our product EncryptUSB and the reason for the block was because I included link to our software (sorry, didn't know before that you consider it as a spam). We are planning to update this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_disk_encryption_software . As I mentioned, our CEO is donating 100$ a year for many years to Wiki (Lev Bolotin, email: lev.bolotin@clevx.com) so I'm really surprising that we were blocked for just correcting this article and having link to the product (understood it was mistake) and will not be added anymore.

Decline reason:

Whether or not your CEO donates is irrelevant. We are all volunteers here. The donation does not permit you to violate WP:COI. Now, you've told us what you wanted to do. Now you know that is inappropriate, now you've read WP:COI, what will you edit instead? You'll also need to pick a new username, one that adheres to WP:USERNAME. If your only goal is to write about your company, this is the end of the line. Yamla (talk) 11:09, 7 February 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Clevx (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

As I've mentioned, the goal is to update list of encryption software by adding the following: EncryptUSB. Also, I'll correct this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_encrypted_external_drives because it doesn't include SecureData hardware encryption drives and Kingston DT2000 hardware encryption Flash drive. Once unlocked, first thing I'll create a new username because I understood that the current one violating Wiki rules.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. kingboyk (talk) 13:45, 8 February 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have revoked your talk page. You aren't listening to what you've been told, you aren't addressing the concerns that lead to your block, and this isn't getting anywhere. If your current request is declined, this leaves you with WP:UTRS. You'll want to take a completely different approach if you avail yourself of UTRS. --Yamla (talk) 15:59, 7 February 2020 (UTC)Reply