Welcome. Legacypac (talk) 09:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Greetings! Feel free to ask me questions or brief me on the happenings of Wikipedia below! Thank you!

NZ election polling article

edit

Not a problem, you may wish to change the electorate polling for consistency as well. Sleepingstar (talk) 23:16, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks so much for the notifications on Wikimedia Commons, but as you have already figured out, I don't really mind to be honest. (Once one puts anything onto wikipedia, it is bound to be edited and reproduced anyway, which is part for the whole wiki philosophy). 06:17, 13 September 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sleepingstar (talkcontribs)
edit

Note that I've deleted the photo taken from the Japan Times. Do not help yourself to photos that are not freely licensed - this is a copyright infringement. Schwede66 06:58, 11 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

"Next"

edit

In your edit summary you stated "like other election articles", well other articles state the year instead of "next". Or when you meant by "other", do you mean by PM elections instead of presidential elections? Typhoon2013 (talk) 04:23, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

October 2017

edit
 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Lcmortensen (mailbox) 00:41, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Lcmortensen: There is no justification for banning me at all. My edit is completely legitimate and is being removed without any explanation. I have reached out to you on the talk page to explain why you think it should be removed and you will not participate in a discussion. We are both in an edit it war, and on the intellectual side of it, you are losing. Clesam11 (talk) 00:44, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Clesam11 reported by User:Lcmortensen (Result: ). Thank you. Lcmortensen (mailbox) 00:48, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring at Next New Zealand general election

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:35, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Image of Ardern

edit

Here to say thanks for adjusting the crop of the image of Ardern. Looks much better. TravisD (talk) 09:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks and no problem! Clesam11 (talk) 09:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Clesam11. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Licensing

edit

You seem to have ongoing issues with licensing of files. Rather than make rules up yourself, I suggest you read the official policy. Granted, it's a complicated topic, but there's no way round knowing what it is that you can and can't do with files. Schwede66 08:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

I assumed that a file that allows sharing and altering as long as it was not for commercial purposes would be appropriate for wikipedia without double checking the rules. To be fair, that is quite confusing - but I will take a lot more care from now on. Clesam11 (talk) 09:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Next New Zealand general election

edit

OK on your reversion of my edit. On my iPad, the table was so wide that it resulted in compression of the text sections to much less than the full width of the screen. Perhaps that didn't show for users with laptops/desktops. I believed I had fixed it, but the lower table also caused the same problem. I left it at that point, unsure whether to adjust it too. Anyway, am satisfied with the revert, even though it's horrible on my iPad. Akld guy (talk) 02:03, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Akld guy: Sorry to hear that. My S5 and iPad have no trouble scrolling horizontally across wikitables and they look fine on my end. Are you sure your iOS and browser are both updated to their most recent versions? If it keeps happening for you with everything up to date then i'd be cool with finding a way to make it look tidy while also being less wide. Clesam11 (talk) 02:18, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
This iPad is the original version that came out years ago; a hand-me-down from my sister. No updates since about 2012 because of no support, but it does things remarkably well except for the occasional oddity. A later version iPad has been offered to me and it should be in my hands next week. Akld guy (talk) 03:03, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Clesam11. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Clesam11. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

NZ polling graphs

edit

Hey there,

It was too hard for the longest time to fix the old nz polling graph, but I had a bit of go tonight. I'm pretty agnostic, but you should definitely weigh in

 

Limegreen (talk) 23:54, 11 February 2019 (UTC)Reply


Hi, @Limegreen:

The graph is looking great! I heavily prefer the smoothed trendline in comparison to the 2-point moving one in my graph. Only thing i'm wondering is if there's any way we can change the colours of the trendlines to be more defined and accurate to their real parties colours? Or is it stuck taking the colours directly off the wikitable? Either way, if you'd like to replace the current graph with this one i'm all for it! Clesam11 (talk) 00:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Somewhat ridiculously, I had the colours manually set, but as I was testing my scripting skills, I set it to take the colours off the table. I'll revert the colours, get rid of the +/- INF and upload. Cheers, and thanks for keeping the graphs there in the interim. Limegreen (talk) 10:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
Hey, @Limegreen:
No trouble at all! Glad to have your graph back in service! Clesam11 (talk) 10:55, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Update graph request

edit

Hi, just here to ask if you can please update a graph you made. Polls have been added on 2020 New Zealand cannabis referendum since the last update from March 2019, March 2020, and two from June 2020.

 
Opinion polling leading up to the 2020 New Zealand cannabis referendum.

All the best. Helper201 (talk) 06:11, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Polling dates

edit

Hi and thanks for filling in the polling dates for the recent Roy Morgan poll. Just for future references, where do you find the polling dates as I could not find them in the article. Thanks so much. Typhoon2013 (talk) 02:53, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:52nd New Zealand Parliament

edit

 Template:52nd New Zealand Parliament has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 18:54, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Reply