Clementeciamarra

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for spam, advertising, or promotion. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

➲ REDVERS ^{The internet is for porn} 16:15, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Clementeciamarra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am new to posting and was shocked by certain indivuals actions removing amd it wasnt intended as spam or vandalism. i had something usefull to add in the discussion and just added it for a reason. the relationship with the phoenix is key here, and wayne herschel has missed that. note this indivuial is hostile simon singh has discard wayne herschel and i advice wayne i would add to this content because i had something different. on facebook i disclose simons actions and mention he was targetting me as well as wayne herschel - certain indiviuals have there believes and if it contradicts it they because troublesome - and in the same for Redvers. i only found out about then i notice the talk messages - i didnt no see them earlier - and i believe the posts were being removed by hackers as wayne herschel as mention to me. anyhow i have pointed out simon to a audience in facebook and now he has change his hostile atitude to wayne it appears. needless to say being new - i would of fell in accordance if i would of seen those talk posts - so thus i wish to have myself unblock - regards clemente ciamarra - and im over 50 - and a mature indivuial - and do have value content which as been missed here on this page /

Decline reason:

Your edits were entirely inappropriate for an encyclopedia. They were not verifiable facts, they were not cited to a reliable source, and they were ungrammatical. Unblocking you would be harmful to the encyclopedia. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:48, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Add topic