May 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Tom Weisner. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Fox816 (talk) 15:07, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

June 2010

edit

  Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tom Weisner, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:17, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I did give an abundance of justifications that were ignored by you constantly. This article is extremely non neutral and the references are misquoted. You seem to have also deleted those justifications. There are non biographical statements about Tom Weisner in the article, inaccurate citations, and items that try to link historical events to each other that have no justification.

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Tom Weisner, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.JamesBWatson (talk) 13:15, 7 June 2010 (UTC)Reply