Citizenwatt

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Mia Rose, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, see:

• Policy on neutral point of view
• Guideline on spam
• Guideline on external links
• Guideline on conflict of interest

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and how to develop articles
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• Article wizard for creating new articles
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome!

Copyright problems with File:Miarose.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Miarose.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.models1.co.uk/details.asp?sac=&subid=4127&modelid=480347&areaid=0&x=&sexid=&careerid=&curpage=3&SubmitSearch=&txtsoftsearch=&cboCareer=&cboSex=&cboEye=&cboHair=&cboBust=&cboCup=&cboEthnic=&cboHeightFrom=&cboHeightTo=&submit=. As a copyright violation, File:Miarose.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Miarose.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Miarose.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Miarose.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Miarose.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 04:44, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Re: Mia Rose

Thank you for your message, and again welcome to Wikipedia.

As management for Mia Rose, the first guideline document you should carefully review is Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. This means you need to exercise considerable caution when considering edits to Mia Rose, although the guideline permits these in some non-controversial cases.

In general, the welcome message above links to the major policies and practices here.

Note that statements in Wikipedia should be verifiable and traceable to reliable sources. For example regarding her name, we'd need some reference(s) to support 'Maria Antónia Teixeira Rosa' as there seem to be more available sources to support 'Maria Antónia Sampaio Rosa' (e.g. Metro, TVI24).

I've done a small edit regarding SIME/Google Zeitgeist to try to indicate some context. However, some caution needs to be taken to avoid an unduly promotional tone (per WP:NPOV policy).

Regarding YouTube stats, some of these are harder to verify. It may be better to include secondary published reports with available (primary source) YouTube info. See WP:PRIMARY for further background on this.

As for the photo, since it was published on the Models 1 website, there should probably be some statement from them concurring with your release of the photo as Creative Commons licencing. The authorship of the photo should also be clearly indicated. It's probably best to review Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials and for you to follow the procedure at Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries when contacting Wikipedia's permissions email. However, a good performance photo often works better for musician articles than a publicity still.

This is a brief overview of the issues involved at Wikipedia. Hope this has helped. Dl2000 (talk) 01:23, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Mia Rose

I would like the image was available for other than Wikipedia in English. How do I allow this to happen? --Alejandrocaro35 (talk) 16:08, 14 December 2009 (UTC)