CineBrick315
|
 Archives |
|---|
templates and colours/colors edit
As far as I can tell there are no strictures on modifications in oz templates. Best just to do it, and wait and see.... JarrahTree 03:08, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- Very interesting! I might just try a few things and see where it gets me! CineBrick315 (talk) 04:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- read my deleted more historically elusive/allusive message (I assume you know how to trawl through your page's edit history) the editor named in there is particularly good with templates... JarrahTree 04:21, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- intriguing - just came across - overcoloured (with curly brackets at either side) JarrahTree 12:03, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started edit
Hello, CineBrick315. Thank you for your work on Blair Street Bridge. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:56, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! I will endeavour to find more resources for it shortly CineBrick315 (talk) 02:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
February 2024 edit
Your edit to Tasman Bridge has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 23:50, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
trust your weather is ok edit
I must say that having driven through the place of New Norfolk (and probably over the bridge a few times),https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blair_Street_Bridge is a very pertinent issue of misplacement - of leaving sources at the bottom of the page, where in fact they possibly they could have been used as parts of citations - as the article is not the problem, its the lack of qualifying the information and assertions... it would be really appreciated if you were able to understand the importance of cleaning it up, and utilizing the source as a cite. Thanks. JarrahTree 03:59, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi there, yes, most of the article is based on the first source (Department of Public Works). It is a large file from the state library which contains the documentation of its design and construction, estimates etc. When I first visited the library I failed to note pages etc, meaning I have to physically go back to the library to confirm a few things before I add the citations. I'll make some time for it shortly! CineBrick315 (talk) 06:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hello! I have made a huge amount of changes to the Blair Street Bridge article :) I've added as many sources as possible. It's quite the topic - the article could easily be expanded to incorporate a more detailed history of the first three bridges near its location. CineBrick315 (talk) 09:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- The unbelievably important thing of notes at the time of sight - I remember being in the old library archive in the twentieth century (no need for the year) and being very slack about referencing and note taking... I thus have a few images from west coast newspapers pre-1940, but no idea which year, edition or page... The thing about previous bridges, a lot depends if you can link the four (?) bridges in a single article, worth the effort if you can. JarrahTree 09:17, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 6 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mount Nelson, Tasmania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern Outlet.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 6 March 2024 (UTC)