Christianjoseph89

Welcome!

Hello, Christianjoseph89, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Makecat_Talk 06:26, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rev.Sr Rani Maria

A tag has been placed on Rev.Sr Rani Maria requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Makecat_Talk 06:26, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Caste system among Indian Christians, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.Arjayay (talk) 17:40, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

One of the more interesting messages I have had, thank you. I deleted teh very short article you created about a religious person because it did not establish her notability. Please read our guideline at WP:N. If you are struggling to learn Wikipedia's policies, then I suggest that you use the Wikipedia:Article wizard. The JPS^{talk to me} 18:37, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Social unity among indian christians

A tag has been placed on Social unity among indian christians, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

It may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion under CSD A10

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.

It appears that, having tried to substitute the entire text of Caste system among Indian Christians, but had that reverted, you have created this article using the same text solely in order to try and redirect that article to this PoV article.
Arjayay (talk) 18:04, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Warning

Please note that Wikipedia is not a blog to promote your personal views, we are governed by policies and guidelines. Please read the links in the welcome note before contributing any further. If you continue to edit disruptively, you will be blocked. —SpacemanSpiff 04:32, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:41, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Christianjoseph89 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

because i don't have anything to do with other users,and it is not decent to block a user forever.blocking other users account shows some kind of vested interests or otherwise mental illness (from cyber routine overdose) of those administrators Christianjoseph89 (talk) 08:20, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Making accusations of vested interests or mental illness against the admin who blocked you will not get you unblocked. Also, an indefinite block is not necessarily forever - can be lifted if you address the problems with your behavior that led to the block. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:21, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

please unblock me request

because i don't have anything to do with other users,and it is not decent to block a user forever.blocking other users account shows some kind of vested interests or otherwise mental illness (from cyber routine overdose) of those administrators Christianjoseph89 (talk) 08:20, 13 August 2012 (UTC)Christianjoseph89 (talk) 08:22, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Nope, it's not crazy to conclude that these accounts are all the same person when they all create an article about the same subject in the same manner around the same time. --Kinu ^t/_c 09:26, 13 August 2012 (UTC)