ChristianCorreia86
I have been watching the recent edits using Huggle, and I noticed you replacing the names of the social website mentioned in the article. I reverted the edit, not realizing that this was a part of you adding the entries and that the revert would remove them altogether.
However, you have added a lot of specific details in the entries, and the linked articles supports none of this information. For example, the article about Gauteng murders says nothing about this being a gang crime or that the perpetrators used online dating services, let alone specific ones. So what is the source of the information? A different news article? Or is it some rumor or speculation? See the policy of verifiability. (It may be the case that I have been right in my removal of the entries, though for the wrong reason.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 22:25, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
I will amended it and included two sources, one which confirms gang involvement and one which confirms dating sites. (ChristianCorreia86 (talk) 22:37, 10 December 2017 (UTC)).
- The update is good, but the other entry about the Sizzlers massacre also contains information which is not supported by the reference. (I will probably remove the final sentence.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)