Please see Talk:Christian_anarchism#Text_from_anon, regarding your insert --nirvana2013 16:02, 21 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your edit to Christian terrorism, being a comentary on the article, belongs on the talk page for that article, not in the article itself, so I moved it there. Thanks, Tom Harrison Talk 14:55, 22 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

December 2009 edit

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Greenhouse gas. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.--CurtisSwain (talk) 19:33, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:ChristianAnarchist edit

 

A tag has been placed on User:ChristianAnarchist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cahk (talk) 09:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Edits to Nathan Rich edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. The YouTube channel in question has been extensively discussed in the AfD and Talk pages for Nathan Rich, and the consensus was that it was not notable. If you think it merits inclusion, open a new topic in the Talk page and we can discuss. DrIdiot (talk) 04:30, 19 December 2019 (UTC)Reply