Hi ChristalinC, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Nole (chat·edits) 03:01, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

In addition to the above little welcome message, I just want to let you know that I replied to you on my talk page. Nole (chat·edits) 03:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

--> Hi Nolelover, thank you for your message. Just to clarify, I represent Colombo Fashion Week and this copy was written for both our website and the Wikipedia page. Does it still mean, I have to reword all of it for it to appear on the page or can it be reverted to this version: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Colombo_Fashion_Week&oldid=966361175

You cannot use copyrighted text on Wikipedia, even if you are the copyright holder. Please review the following note:

Wikipedia and copyright edit

  Hello ChristalinC, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Colombo Fashion Week have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:48, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

July 2020 edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button   located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:19, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply


July 30, 2020 edit

Thank you for clarifying Drm310, I will reword the article as per guidelines. --ChristalinC (talk) 07:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

@ChristalinC: I just want to go ahead and flag a couple of other issues that will likely arise with your edits. You mentioned that you represent CFW--I assume that means you're employed by them. This is a fairly basic conflict of interest and while that doesn't mean you're prohibited from editing Wikipedia, you're going to face a higher standard in regards to the edits you make. Here is Wikipedia's plain and simple conflict of interest guide and I encourage you to read over this, as your edits will continually get reverted if you don't understand the bullet points at the top of that page. Broadly speaking, you need to remember that Wikipedia is not a place to advertise the fashion week, so the material you add needs to be backed up by independent sourcing--not just histories or explanations that the CFW has published about itself (aka primary or first-party sources). You can use primary sources for basic facts (say, where and when the fashion week happens or who founded it) but when demonstrating why the CFW is important or notable, you really should point to third-party sources. Let me know if you have any questions. Nole (chat·edits) 16:04, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
One more comment--it's totally fine to use non-English third-party sources. If there are trustworthy Sir Lankan newspapers that have written about CFW, it's perfectly fine to use those as sources. Nole (chat·edits) 16:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply