User talk:ChrisHodgesUK/Archives/2010
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Supporting edits of a banned user
Hello, please do not remove the reversions I made which were totally within policy C5. 86.186.147.165 (talk) 22:19, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
These edits were all made by User:HistorianofLogic who is identified as sock of Damian. 86.186.147.165 (talk) 22:22, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Rudeness
You were completely out of order to revert my edit to Caroline Herschel and then leave me a snotty message accusing me of vandalism. You should read what people have written before letting accusations fly. I doubt I'll be sharing any more of my knowledge if this is how I'm thanked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.209.54 (talk) 21:27, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Dear Andy
I can hand this to an arbitrator, or go find a "goofy" wiki site and save you the angina. I KNOW that stuff like sarcasm doesn't come through readily via the printed page. i also know that snipe should have explained that all, and that by "including" it in the painted snipe page I kinda, sorta protected it, ipso facto.
i've had great fun and don't wish to cause you more grief. If you wish, I shall create a nagging snipe page and be done with it. frankly, it's not a bad idear, if I do say so myself. Not knee-slapper funny, but ok,i suppose.
Apologies! I'm actually CRACKING UP over it all, which can be considered intellectual cruelty. I feel shame. 2 minutes in the box. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Regnad kcin75 (talk • contribs) 18:06, 14 December 2010 (UTC)