AfC notification: Draft:Vermont SportsCar has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vermont SportsCar. Thanks! ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:49, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vermont SportsCar (December 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 20:03, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Chowderphone! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 20:03, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vermont SportsCar (June 4) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deb was:  The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Deb (talk) 14:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi Deb, I do not -- I am a local car enthusiast in New England where Vermont SportsCar is based. I made all previous changes to make the sources neutral and outside of Vermont SportsCar, which had the majority of the information I was writing about.
I am confused by your statement that this post "reads more like an advertisement." I think it mirrors the language and tone of other Motorsports teams such as Team Penske. Vermont SportsCar is a major player in U.S. rallying and is entirely related to Subaru, which is also on Wikipedia. Can you please be more clear on what you want to be changed? Chowderphone (talk) 14:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Vermont SportsCar has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vermont SportsCar. Thanks! CNMall41 (talk) 21:32, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vermont SportsCar has been accepted edit

 
Vermont SportsCar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 07:46, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! Chowderphone (talk) 20:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Subaru WRX STI VT23r.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Subaru WRX STI VT23r.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 22:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply