Copyright problems with Image:Aztecastadium.jpg edit

An image that you uploaded, Image:Aztecastadium.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. the Dúnadan 16:33, 10 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Duplicate images uploaded edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Parquecountrygdll.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Parquecountry.jpg. The copy called Image:Parquecountry.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 23:32, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with Image:Elsamodel.jpg edit

An image that you uploaded, Image:Elsamodel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. the Dúnadan 23:52, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply


Hello, chokolate, thanks for colaborating in the article fo Guadalajara i would like to invite u to help me out to colaborate with some information too, by traducing the from the sansh wikipedia guadalajara article, thanks agaian and were in touch.

--Raveonpraghga 11:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Little context in List of Mexico world heritage site edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on List of Mexico world heritage site, by Clamster5, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because List of Mexico world heritage site is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting List of Mexico world heritage site, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate List of Mexico world heritage site itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:05, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mexico gallery edit

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Mexico gallery, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 00:02, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia is not a collection of photographs or media files. The page should be copied to Wikipedia Commons, a sister site of Wikipedia that is especially for galleries of images. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 00:31, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
See http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mexico for an example. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 00:33, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Just to clarify something. Your pictures, which are beautiful... by the way, will not be deleted. We just need to find articles where they may be included. I created this one, for example: World Heritage Sites in Mexico, self explanatory, and added some of your pictures in it. --FateClub 00:50, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Yamamoto Ichiro (山本一郎)(会話) 22:00, 7 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Photos edit

A few things regarding images you've uploaded.

  1. Can you explain how you took the image Image:Gdlphsky.jpg, and when? How did you get it on your computer?
  2. Can you explain how you took the image Image:Cd de mexico.jpg, as well?
  3. Image:Panoramaph.jpg has a conflicting license on it. The photo claims the photo is copyrighted but you've released it into the public domain, which is it?
  4. Are you Enrique Hernánez, as Image:Panoramaph.jpg would suggest?

Also, please talk using normal capitalisation. ALL CAPS isn't necessary. Thanks. --Deskana (talk) 22:16, 7 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism edit

  That's enough. Edits like this will not be tolerated. Do not vandalise Wikipedia. If you continue, this account may be blocked. --Deskana (talk) 22:20, 7 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please stop. If you continue to remove content from pages, as you did to Guadalajara, Jalisco, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Deskana (talk) 22:22, 7 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. - Yamamoto Ichiro (山本一郎)(会話) 22:24, 7 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.
- Yamamoto Ichiro (山本一郎)(会話) 22:26, 7 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Duplicate images uploaded edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Insidegaleriasmallgdl.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Insidegaleriasmall.jpg. The copy called Image:Insidegaleriasmall.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 03:45, 15 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Andares edit

 

A tag has been placed on Andares, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Phgao 04:44, 16 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Guggenheimgdl.jpg edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Guggenheimgdl.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 15:01, 22 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Andaress.JPG listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Andaress.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 19:00, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Countrytardeada.jpg missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Countrytardeada.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 18:50, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Image:Exteriorhiltongdl.jpg edit

 

A tag has been placed on Image:Exteriorhiltongdl.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Exteriorhiltongdl.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bidgee (talk) 05:59, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Image:Guadanight.JPG edit

 

A tag has been placed on Image:Guadanight.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement [www.flickr.com/photos/filippo79/354920963/]. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Guadanight.JPG|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bidgee (talk) 12:58, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Hospiciocabañass.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation [www.flickr.com/photos/avenue44/415877258/], Image:Hospiciocabañass.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Hospiciocabañass.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Hospiciocabañass.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Hospiciocabañass.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Hospiciocabañass.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 13:00, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Plazaandares.JPG edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Plazaandares.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 13:02, 15 August 2008 (UTC) --Bidgee (talk) 13:02, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Saopaolagdl.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Saopaolagdl.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:49, 11 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Colon.jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Colon.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:PHreciente.JPG listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:PHreciente.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:40, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:13ac4.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:13ac4.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ZooFari 17:58, 15 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Technomarine edit

 

A tag has been placed on Technomarine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Abc518 (talk) 00:03, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Technomarine.gif edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Technomarine.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 04:49, 12 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:2624211385.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:2624211385.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILYsock (TALK) 06:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Acueductogdl.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Acueductogdl.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 01:46, 4 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Jaydimichelmodeljal.JPG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jaydimichelmodeljal.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:41, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Rbd-4-fdo-aceves.jpg listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rbd-4-fdo-aceves.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Xelhabeacch.jpg listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Xelhabeacch.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Andaresconstru.jpg listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Andaresconstru.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 23:25, 8 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with File:Centrosp.jpg edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Centrosp.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=26801830#post26801830. As a copyright violation, File:Centrosp.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Centrosp.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Centrosp.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-en wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Centrosp.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Centrosp.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 11:27, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with File:Phconstt.jpg edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Phconstt.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=26182066&postcount=1189. As a copyright violation, File:Phconstt.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Phconstt.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Phconstt.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-en wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Phconstt.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Phconstt.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 11:30, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with File:Phvistadesdeagencia.jpg edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Phvistadesdeagencia.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.skyscraperlife.com/ciudades-y-arquitectura-la/16312-skylines-de-sus-paises-33.html#post443640. As a copyright violation, File:Phvistadesdeagencia.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Phvistadesdeagencia.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 11:31, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with File:Phtunel.jpg edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Phtunel.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.skyscraperlife.com/ciudades-y-arquitectura-la/16312-skylines-de-sus-paises-33.html#post443640. As a copyright violation, File:Phtunel.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Phtunel.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Phtunel.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-en wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Phtunel.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Phtunel.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 11:32, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with File:Acapulquito2aq4.jpg edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Acapulquito2aq4.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=13205472&postcount=6. As a copyright violation, File:Acapulquito2aq4.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Acapulquito2aq4.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 11:40, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with File:Restoranvallarta.jpg edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Restoranvallarta.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=4990796&postcount=196. As a copyright violation, File:Restoranvallarta.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Restoranvallarta.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 11:44, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

All your uploads edit

From the very first to the very last upload, all your uploads are stolen and uploaded here with lies such as "its entirely my own work". See Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2012_August_19#Files_by_Chokolate. --Martin H. (talk) 12:02, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with File:Intercontinentalgdl.jpg edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Intercontinentalgdl.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=417592&page=2. As a copyright violation, File:Intercontinentalgdl.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Intercontinentalgdl.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 19:06, 22 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of TechnoMarine edit

 

The article TechnoMarine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:03, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Technomarine.gif edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Technomarine.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply