Chikn Nuggit

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Basuria Association

Hello Chikn Nuggit, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Basuria Association, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: fails G11, plus just started. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 19:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello

Hello. I've noticed you tagging a bunch of articles for speedy deletion, and that you are a brand new user. You may want to slow down a bit. Many of the articles you are tagging are not appropriate for the criteria you are using to tag them. I also note that some of your other activities have resulted in a post about you at AN/I. You won't last long at this rate, so I suggest you slow down and familiarize yourself with the community a little better. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 19:04, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

• What she said. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 19:04, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chikn Nuggit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My edits are in good faith, and no proper reason was given for a block

Decline reason:

Confirmed checkuser block, removing talk page access. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• You are evading two blocks on two separate ranges that are in place to prevent you, specifically, from editing. -- Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

That doesn't answer my question Chikn Nuggit (talk) 19:38, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Saying that someone is a sock without evidence is a violation of WP:NPA Chikn Nuggit (talk) 19:43, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

• This is pretty much what I expected. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:51, 29 March 2023 (UTC)