Your submission at Articles for creation Chiffon Ma-ry

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


Reliable sources and references have been provided, TV Coverage and Media Outlets so I do not know what you mean by of no importance, there are a ton of articles on here of no importance if you want to go there so I do not know what you mean or are trying to convey by your comment. I am not sure if you looked at those references but at this point, it is really starting to seem like quite a few of you like to go around patrolling trying to give reasons on why people`s pages should not be posted when in fact their are relevant sources and references provided. So your second opinion seems a little off to me when you are sitting here telling me I am of no importance are there are no relevant sources when their they are provided. Are you the one who decides whose articles stay or go just curious? There have been quite a few misleading individuals on this site portraying themselves as someone other than who they really are, claiming they are administrators and such which I have had to address many times because it is making it an issue for me. I am well aware of what a verifiable source is and it has been provided but for you to tell someone their article is of unimportance is a bit much when you have never met me nor are involved in what has happened in my career thus far. Thanks

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Chiffonmary, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 05:25, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chiffon Ma-ry concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chiffon Ma-ry, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:06, 20 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chiffon Ma-ry

edit
 

Hello Chiffonmary. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Chiffon Ma-ry".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chiffon Ma-ry}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 06:01, 2 February 2014 (UTC)Reply