July 2011

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Elmo's World, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Elmo's World was changed by ChickenFreel (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.923428 on 2011-07-03T17:55:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Claustrophobia with this edit, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 18:06, 3 July 2011 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of "Hershey squirts"

edit
 

A page you created, Hershey squirts, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Island Monkey talk the talk 18:09, 3 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Hershey squirts

edit
 

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Talk:Hershey squirts, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Island Monkey talk the talk 18:10, 3 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Poot. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 18:12, 3 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Shrike (talk) 19:19, 3 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

User:Hairhorn believes this account is a sock of Aawjgnekr. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aawjgnekr/Archive for background. EdJohnston (talk) 02:06, 4 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

This is clearly both a sock and a vandal account; the sockmaster is a best guess based on ongoing longterm vandalism to Elmo's World. I say clearly a sock because User:BridgeBearer is obviously the same person. Hairhorn (talk) 02:09, 4 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
It could be worthwhile for you to file ChickenFreel and BridgeBearer at SPI. It is likely the checkusers would look into it and they might find sleeper accounts. EdJohnston (talk) 02:50, 4 July 2011 (UTC)Reply