User talk:Chesdovi/Archive 10

Archive 5

←

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

October 2021

To enforce an arbitration decision and for You are topic banned from zionism, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 6m. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

• Per this thread you acknowledge editing Elazer Shach is a tban vio as you asked for it to be waived to allow you to edit it. You were then warned by me that the previous edits were vios but continue to edit it after being told I would not chance your tbans. You then compound it, you make an edit to a section on zionism in your sandbox. I can't really see that as anything other than a breaching experiment so its time for more reflection on your part about how you can continue to edit without breaching your various tbans Spartaz ^Humbug! 10:06, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
  • No @Spartaz:, you misunderstand. Other admins have previously confirmed pages like ES (like DBG) are not under IP tban. The same would apply to ES viz-a-viz zionism. I therefore did not comprehend your comment "I can't see how your existing edits to this article, which appears to be about a renowned antizionist is not already either a tban vio in some way" and glossed over it. (That's why El C was at pains to explain how tban was violated at DBG). I asked for my zio-ban to be lifted, not in order to edit on that page, but to add material relating to Zionism. I had been adding it to Sandbox unaware that doing so constituted a vio of the ban.

If I recall correctly, you banned me from Zionism for what was originally believed a vio of the a IP conflict tban. As I had been lead to believe, and corroborated by the earlier involved Admin Ed, adding material about 4th cent. P rabbis should not have been considered a violation. You can't expect editors to adhere to tbans if there is no consensus what constitutes a violation! I think you will agree it's unfair to be told one thing by one Admin and then be retrospectively blocked by another. I think you added Zionism for my adding a slew of unthoughtful zio-cats. All over the top if you ask me. Yet you refused to lift it from just one page? Surely one shows improvement by editing in the specific area of contention. I am at odds to understand how my additions to ES on the subject will be disrupt the project. You can see how much effort I expended and how restrained I was just to get the lead expanded. Chesdovi (talk) 02:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jewish Community of Hebron logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jewish Community of Hebron logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:06, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Home of Rebbe in Husiatyn.jpg

The file File:Home of Rebbe in Husiatyn.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low quality. Superseded by File:Manor of Rebbe in Husiatyn.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 02:04, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Ani security fence for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ani security fence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ani security fence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Joy (talk) 23:19, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Elazar Shach.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Elazar Shach.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Mordechai Sholom Yosef Friedman of Sadigura-Przemyszl.gif listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mordechai Sholom Yosef Friedman of Sadigura-Przemyszl.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 05:23, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Western Wall

Western Wall has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)