Cheffounet
Welcome! edit
Hello, Cheffounet, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Theopolisme 21:06, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Social BPM edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Social BPM requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theopolisme 21:06, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- Please work on the article in your sandbox instead of main article space. Once it is fleshed out with appropriate citations and no copyright violations, you can move it to main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:35, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- Also, you can reply here or on my talk page. Don't create sub-pages in other people's user spaces if you want to communicate.
- The topic of your article probably merits inclusion in Wikipedia, it's just that we are really strict about copyright violations, which yours was, in spite of your stated intent to improve it. You can continue working on your userspace version, User:Cheffounet/Social BPM, at your leisure without worrying about someone coming along and deleting it. If you do that, drop me a note when you think it's ready and I'll gladly review it. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:34, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello Amatulić,
The article on Social BPM is now ready for review. Hope everything is conform to Wikipedia policy.
Best Regards
Thierry Cheffounet (talk) 09:38, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- It isn't quite ready yet. See Wikipedia:Articles with a single source. Even the single source you cite is a dead link; you need to fix that. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:54, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
It would be magic to publish the Social BPM article exactly on the day when Cuba has lifted the travel ban!
http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/news/international/Cuba_lifting_hated_travel_restrictions.html?cid=33742416 Cheffounet (talk) 07:36, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Social BPM.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! France3470 (talk) 03:40, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Talkback edit
Message added 03:51, 23 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Referencing may look daunting, but it's easy enough to do. Here's a guide to getting started. References are important to validate your writing and inform the reader. Any editor can remove unreferenced material, and unsubstantiated articles may end up getting deleted, so when you add something to an article, it's advisable to also include a reference to say from where it came. If you need any assistance, let me know.
Talkback edit
Wikipedia's ideals are about to die.
http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/is_wikipedia_going_commercial/
But utopian ideals often become diluted when put into practice on a large scale and inevitably fail.
-> like in business a large scale needs a workflow as a backbone
To bring Wikipedia back to an oasis from commercialization, it’s not the commissioned editors that should be given attention, but rather the reasons for their success — abrasive discussions, convoluted guidelines, impersonal communication, and so on. In other words, people would be much less likely to pay for an edit if learning the ways of Wiki-world was a painless task. Wikipedians may be their own worst enemy; if they can’t learn to get along, the empire they’ve created may deteriorate.
-> publishers of new posts need a Social BPM workflow explaining them on a more friendly manner how to prepare their posts
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Social BPM.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
The Wikipedia idea is about to die with the kind support of the editors refusing innovation edit
Hello!
The Wikipedia idea is about to die.
http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/is_wikipedia_going_commercial/
Your old fashioned bureaucratic editing language herited from the last century might be useful to tell about the Mormons but not to carry innovative ideas.
On one hand one is not allowed to copy excerpts from books or articles. On the other hand one needs to respect existing sources. Innovation killed.
What do you think would have been Moise's reaction if Wikipedia would have asked him to document his sources to write the 10 commandments?
My sources here for Social BPM are wisdom, knowledge, experience, existing articles, and INSPIRATION.
If it helps I can enter INSPIRATION in the sources.
Social BPM is a powerful concept that could be useful for many applications.
If I manage to deliver an european concept of Social Media avoiding the pitfalls of Facebook with suicides and turmoil will you approve my article?
I will not change one word now. I can wait until Wikipedia goes commercial.
Best Regards
Cheffounet (talk) 02:28, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Talkback edit
Message added 02:34, 29 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 02:34, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Social BPM in Action edit
Great feedback, many thanks!
Firstly, I can only apologize for my compulsive behaviour, here the explanation http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acting_out (indeed this is my first and only article so far on Wikipedia as a translation, got to grips with your strange logic of lacking sources although I did clearly refer to the english version and explained it was a 1:1 translation)
Secondly, thanks for your comments regarding the difficulty to edit on Wikipedia. The Jews have managed to keep their religion intact over thousands of years. Not sure if despite or thanks to persecution. Your religion is a bit too complicated for catholics to understand. Same complexity as editing a Wikipedia article. Same values of truth and wisdom. Maybe the Jews have experimented to launch a 'pagan catholic' flavour . In fact I am watching the jewish religion television on Sunday mornings. So yes, with values and money behind the Wikipedia concept it will never be commercial. Great!
Here my theory about the catholic religion and how the Mormons are trying to fix it: http://46.4.200.140/webcentral/Colt?objid=312 ID : coltRoger Password : coltRoger12 Clck on the pictures to activate linked documents
The article on Cuba cigar readers does not mention Social BPM simply because Cuba has been ahead of our time. Furthermore this has been a real INSPIRATION for me.
The scholarly article does not include statistics etc... but this is a tribut to the Italians who seem to do some real good work here. Anyway, these Italians have already been mentioned in books, slides etc... so no worries if you would like me to delete this reference.
No worries if you would like me to delete the slides.
My intention was to buy the books, read them and if needed adapt my post.
In the meantime I am doing something more useful for mankind. Driving the creation and roll out of an european Content Management system avoiding the pitfalls of Facebook (cyber-mobbing, addiction, suicide) but leveraging the useful technical capabilities like sharing pictures remotely permission-based and content fully under the control of the creator with nothing exposed on the web. Cheffounet (talk) 10:40, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Fidel Design Mode.png edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fidel Design Mode.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 02:36, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Social BPM, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:30, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Social BPM edit
Hello Cheffounet. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Social BPM".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Social BPM}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DGG ( talk ) 17:28, 13 December 2013 (UTC)