October 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Villanova College has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 07:50, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your account is being used only for unconstructive editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 07:53, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but recent edits of yours have an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Four times you have used the edit summary "Citation added where required" for edits which did not add any citation, but did add questionable content. It is difficult to avoid the impression that this was a deliberate attempt to be deceptive. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:23, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Clairvaux Mackillop College. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:22, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

February 2011 edit

  This is your only warning; if you post an improperly placed joke on Wikipedia again, as you did at Anglican Church Grammar School, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I'm not assuming good faith because you have made these edits maliciously and tried to cover up your work by 'adding references' in the edit summary. JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 02:15, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case edit

 

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Che burger 1 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 01:24, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply