Chaturaji

Chaturaji, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Chaturaji! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Administrators abusing their power

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chaturaji (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The administrator Kinu Panda has blocked me to further his own agenda and accusing me of edit warring. He is deliberately falsifying information on Wikipedia without quoting any respectable sources. I merely quote form the highest authority in chess history, H J Murray from his book ‘A history of Chess’ as well as other scholars and other respected orientalists. I would appreciate if a non biased administrator who knows much of chess history can amend the error of judgement made by this administrator. Thank you Chaturaji (talk) 18:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Unblock requests containing personal attacks are not considered. This is about you and your disruptive edits, not about either of the admins who have blocked you for your bad behavior. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:30, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 Administrator note The only "agenda" I have is preventing further disruption to the encyclopedia caused by your repeated failure to follow WP:BRD and achieve consensus before reintroducing your edits. Your disruptive behavior started with your edit warring at Chess, and you've continued this behavior at Chaturanga despite being reverted numerous times. While you finally made an attempt to discuss the matter at the talk page of the former article, you continued to disrupt the latter article, often with tendentious edit summaries. Furthermore, I have not introduced any new information to either article, reverting only to previous stable versions per WP:EW and WP:STABLE, so your assertion that I am falsifying anything is blatantly false. I stand by my block. --Kinu ^t/_c 23:05, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

You fail to understand that I also did not add any new information to ‘Chaturanga’ which is already not mentioned under ‘Chess’ or other related Wikipedia articles. You’re argument is therefore flawed. Chaturaji (talk) 23:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

You were the one who introduced this wording into the lead of Chess without any source to back it up, and you were the one who introduced similar wording at History of chess, so your argument is circular. Thanks for pointing that out so both of those leads can be restored to their previous stable versions prior to your disruption. --Kinu ^t/_c 23:17, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Why on earth would you remove my edits which were researched by a great scholar such as h j Murray??

Given this edit, I think I'm done responding unless you have something substantive to say. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

I always believe truth prevails anyway and someone will take note of your agenda and actions. Chaturaji (talk) 11:42, 22 October 2021 (UTC)