CelesteRaynolds1

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Tickle Trunk (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spicy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Tickle Trunk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Tickle Trunk, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spicy (talk) 20:36, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, CelesteRaynolds1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spicy (talk) 20:36, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paragon Cause (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paragon Cause and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   14:09, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Velella, I hope to get help with this and some clarification. I respectfully disagree with all the points with this as there is a reference to a full story published by Exclaim! Magazine on the band, a national online and print Magazine here in Canada. There is a national online article by CBC as well as many other high quality referances. The band won some major awards in Canada (East Coast Music Awards, 2 of them) and I feel as though based on articles and this information as well as charting in Canada, they easily should be published. Furthermore, the band has played with major rock acts including Eric Avery of Jane's Addiction, they have produced remixes for the band Berlin and have won awards for producing music for film soundtracks.

My issue is consistency, why is this band rejected yet hudredsof others with far less notoriety are not?

As an example, I looked to other acts from their location and there are many bands published on Wikipedia that have far less notability and references. One example would be [[1]] a second would be Jimmy Swift Band and a third would be Tome Fun Occhestra. All three of these bands have full Wikipedia pages and not nearly the national and international notability. I think this deletion was in error and should be corrected yet I am unsure where to turn.

I really worry the person who posted the first point is going to add considerable bias to reviewers, I do not think this is appropriate. Just because someone else wrote in an article in the past doesnt mean everyone else should now have bias against them CelesteRaynolds1 (talk) 11:08, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Paragon Cause has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Paragon Cause. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:04, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Tickle Trunk

Hello, CelesteRaynolds1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Tickle Trunk, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Tickle Trunk

Hello, CelesteRaynolds1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Tickle Trunk".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:31, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paragon Cause (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paragon Cause and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 10:36, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Paragon Cause

Hello, CelesteRaynolds1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paragon Cause, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Paragon Cause

Hello, CelesteRaynolds1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paragon Cause".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:17, 26 September 2023 (UTC)