August 2008 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Salinity, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Salinity was changed by Ccamm (u) (t) deleting 8026 characters on 2008-08-26T10:25:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 10:25, 26 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Salinity. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --PLUMBAGO 10:41, 26 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

November 2010 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48hrs for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elen of the Roads (talk) 02:22, 5 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case edit

 

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ccamm for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. –BMRR (talk) 16:05, 5 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Block extended to indefinite per the obvious sockpuppetry demonstrated above. ~ mazca talk 13:00, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply