June 2019 edit

deleted junk who block me from editing?   Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User_talk:Cattleiscows30. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Jimmyshjj☎️📧 04:17, 12 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

re-added page of animals edit

everybody just ruins this page

 
do not destroy this cat

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wolfy. Serols (talk) 18:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC) wait, Cattleiscows30 (talk) 18:36, 12 June 2019 (UTC) did not do it at allReply

June 2019 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 18:37, 12 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

say yeet if you want a unblock from edits edit

yeet

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cattleiscows30 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

someone accused me of vandalizing

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 18:45, 12 June 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

accept this thing below and i will be happy

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cattleiscows30 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

unnecessary for preventing me from editing pages now, i know what i have done

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:42, 12 June 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Think carefully before wasting any more time with another pointless unblock request. You likely only have one more opportunity before losing access to this talk page. --Yamla (talk) 19:42, 12 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cattleiscows30 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

this is not a block to prevent me from making disruptive edits

Decline reason:

Requests must be made while logged in; however, if your request is like this one, you will lose access to this page as Yamla states. 331dot (talk) 00:39, 14 June 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cattleiscows30 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i was just making a redirect change because wolfy rather refers to wolf rather than martian adams

Decline reason:

Yes, that's one of the edits you made. Your original edit to the redirect was defensible. However, this does nothing to address your other edits, which were more disruptive. I suggest that you read WP:GAB, take more time to consider your words, and appeal this block via WP:UTRS. You can get yourself unblocked, but you need to stop screwing around. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:16, 23 June 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As promised, I have reverted your talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 11:05, 23 June 2019 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Cattleiscows30 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #25697 was submitted on Jun 24, 2019 13:38:40. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 13:38, 24 June 2019 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Cattleiscows30 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #25878 was submitted on Jul 11, 2019 19:40:43. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 19:40, 11 July 2019 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Cattleiscows30 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #26054 was submitted on Jul 23, 2019 22:03:01. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 22:03, 23 July 2019 (UTC)Reply