User talk:Cation2020/Jane S. Richardson

Hello Fellow Wikipedians,

In the process of building up a bibliography with reliable sources for a Jane S. Richardson article, I am hoping to have a second opinion on reliability of the following sources:

(1) Christiansen, J. Visualizing Protein Structures https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/sa-visual/visualizing-protein-structures/ (accessed Jan 14, 2020). This source is an article by Scientific American on Richardson's ribbon diagrams.

(2) Jane S. Richardson http://www.nasonline.org/programs/awards/2019-nas-awards/Richardson.html (accessed Jan 14, 2020). This source documents Richardson's recognition through an Alexander Hollaender Award in Biophysics.

(3) Jane Shelby Richardson | Scholars@Duke https://scholars.duke.edu/person/jsr (accessed Jan 14, 2020). Although this source is produced by Duke University, it provides an overview of some of Richardson's research, awards, and publications that might be useful for gathering additional information about her professional accomplishments.

(4) White, S. H. Appreciation. Jane S. Richardson. Biophysical Journal 1992, 63 (5), 1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81695-8. This source introduces Richardson to the Richardson's audience for a 1992 presentation.

Thank you!

I think you have a great start for this Wikipedia page. The lead is strong and draws the reader in. I really like the small box on the side which describes the details of Jane's life. It is quick and easy to read. I recommend adding a picture of Jane to help the article become more complete. Also, I recommend that the biography and research sections to be edit so that it is easier for someone not in science to understand. I like how you found honors that she won. I would recommend that the article emphasizes how important and prestigious these awards are. I would tie in her publications into the research section. It would help the reader who could be in science look up her publications to find out more information. I would recommend that the article adds images of her research so the article becomes more complete. Overall, the article is on the right track. There are a few things to add to make it a lot better. Keep up the hard work. Guacamole21 (talk) 23:51, 27 January 2020 (UTC)