Speedy deletion nomination of Cat Tazer edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Cat Tazer, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lugia2453 (talk) 22:12, 24 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

January 2013 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Promiscuity with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — MSTR (Chat Me!) 14:18, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jack and Jill (film), you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Jack and Jill (film) was changed by CatTazer69 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854056 on 2013-01-28T14:22:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:22, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Topeka, Kansas, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Topeka, Kansas was changed by CatTazer69 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951378 on 2013-01-28T14:40:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:40, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of "Hillary Clinton's clitoris" edit

 

A page you created, Hillary Clinton's clitoris, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it serves only to attack some entity. Please do not continue to create attack pages, as you will be blocked from editing.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. - Happysailor (Talk) 14:45, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Removing Speedy at Hillary Clinton's clitoris edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.

I'm a bot designed by another Wikipedia editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a speedy deletion template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on Wikipedia all the time.

If you don't want the article to get deleted, please click here.

The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the Help desk.

We really hope you'll stick around to help make Wikipedia better! Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 14:46, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:45, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Reply