Disambiguation link notification for November 14 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Buryats, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CEPA. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

My rationale is Center for European Policy Analysis is a reputable Washington D.C.-based public policy institution since 2005, only mentioned in disambiguation page CEPA. CEOs such as [Peter B. Doran] and [since 2020 Alina Polyakova] have been witnesses to United States congressional hearing. There was indeed an article about this NGO, which was [astonishingly deleted], and only mentioned in disambiguation page CEPA.
(Also related was an article by Toki no Nagare ni Mi o Makase (Talk), was surprised that article made by non-east-asian speaker, that article make the cut (Special:PermanentLink/498915237) and didn't get nominated for even merging let alone deletion. The initial page has obvious errors (Teresa Teng (1953–1995) was a Taiwanese/ROC singer, not Chinese PRC singer, an ethnic Chinese huaren yes, a Waishengren yes - (descendent of Chinese civil war refugees fleeing from communism), (zhonghua) huaren refers to Republic of China (ROC) (Taiwan) yes, but not Chinese person/citizen that always refers to Mainland China PRC zhongguo ren. Overseas Chinese diaspora are ethnic Chinese huaren yes but certainly not Chinese citizen (of Mainland China PRC) zhongguo ren) (Also Toki no Nagare ni Mi o Makase is not 我只在乎你/ "我只在你"/我只在你 (我只在( )你) (and certainly not "孚") but actually 時の流れに身をまかせ, is one of the two versions of the song with same tune, in Japanese and Chinese, released at the same time, and many more current errors not just initial errors which had elaborate more in the article talk page, and also not really keen/very reluctant to correct glaring errors & fill in the gap (also elaborated in article talk page) --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 07:26, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

You've got ... edit

... email. Nifsiin (talk) 11:56, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Do you use e-mail? --Nifsiin (talk) 13:56, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Oh, sorry for late reply, just have other activities. Since you came forward publicly here, then I would said yes I did saw your email message. I thought you had seen <<Language>> section below. I only know English and another language, which I'm not proud to say for some reasons, including me myself got hospitalized for Wuhan pneumonia (武漢肺炎) in 2020 (which is not good to be, I mean terrible), (even though wish to be younger) even though I'm a boy/sometimes girl (yes yes I have High Blood Pressure yes)
I'm just happened to encounter After Dark and interested since then via Eurovision (and Melodifestivalen 2004) since Eurovision 2000. However, I don't know Swedish language. So sorry about it. --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 12:36, 27 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
I did not intend to correspond with you in Swedish. English is fine. So you can reply to my email, if you wish. Nifsiin (talk) 14:47, 27 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Language edit

For some various reasons, I reluctant to list my knowledge of languages, I only know just 2, including English --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 15:03, 27 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

That is with regards to other thing, not about After Dark (drag act) which was just finished discussing in open-session just now --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 12:35, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Requested Move edit

@Butterdiplomat:So far there is no more (at least constant) users comment/support/against the requested move. From what I had read WP:RMCLOSE we have to wait for an admin to close the case and also from WP:CR one can request closure via WP:CR at a minimum 7 days at most after 30 days ripe for closure. There is no fixed length for a formal request for comment (RfC). Typically 7 days is a minimum, and after 30 days the discussion is ripe for closure. The best way to tell is when there is little or no activity in the discussion, or further activity is unlikely to change its result. From that quoted paragraph, it seemed can wait for say end of this week instead of waiting for 30 days (30 days to be absolutely OK to close) since there are no more comments/votes and are overwhelmingly supportive of page move... --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 13:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Oh also WP:RMCLOSE said must only be closed by those uninvolved Don't close requested moves if you are involved --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 14:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Understood. I think it’s prudent to wait a week or two for other comments and then request for closure. Completely understood that someone uninvolved would be the one to close. Butterdiplomat (talk) 14:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply