CassieSOUBRETTE

See [1]. Jehochman ^Talk 13:18, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CassieSOUBRETTE (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am no sock. I weighed in on an overzealous block. I also hope all my edits wont be reverted bc they are good edits.

Decline reason:

CU identified you as the reason he blocked the IP range. You are therefore a blocked user evading their block. You are socking per WP:SOCK. Therefore this is a good block per policy. — MBisanz ^talk 04:38, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CassieSOUBRETTE (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I dont know what\who CU is. If another person is blocked I shouldnt be blocked because of them. I am not evading any block because I wasnt ever blocked.

Decline reason:

CU refers to CheckUser, a tool that select users are permitted to use to check and confirm sockpuppet cases. A checkuser compared your IP address to those of others, and came up with conclusive evidence that you were a blocked user evading their block. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 05:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CassieSOUBRETTE (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I do not understand what I am blocked for. I am not anyone's sockpuppet. I looked at the link that was given as proof, it points to my ANI post. Posting an ANI on another person is not enough reason for a block. I did post the ANI and it stands. All customers of an ISP shouldnt be blocked. I was effected for another's actions. I have issue with that action. Link to what Im being accused or violating.

Decline reason:

reason —per above — Rlevse • Talk • 09:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

NOTE: I have full protected this page due to the user removing prior block declines and the sockpuppet evidence. An admin should edit it to decline or accept the current unblock request. Further unblock requests will result in indefinite protection to prevent abuse of the unblocking template. MBisanz ^talk 08:38, 10 April 2008 (UTC)