User talk:Carptrash/Archive 5
Quick reverts
editSee here I use Huggle (which I actually just tested out for the first time. It's very handy for quick reverts and warnings. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:37, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Meaning Huggle just reverts stuff fast; it's pretty easy to use and if you want, you can download it yourself and give it a try (as long as you have rollback rights.) I would like to gently suggest that you consider archiving your talk page as it's getting a bit long and approaching browser-breaking size. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:43, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Archiving This is how I do it and I have a template that you can copy and amend if you want. Let me know if this is still unclear. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:48, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Niehaus
editThat's a great photo of the bas-relief! I've been on a wild-goose chase. The U.S. Senate website mentions an equestrian statue of Grant for NYC by Niehaus, but I think it's a mistake. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 16:43, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- My guess is the one by William Ordway Partridge.
- Not to harp on something that may already be resolved (February 2011), but what is your source for Edmond Amateis having carved the pedimental sculpture for the Buffalo and Erie County Historical Society? The Buffalo Architecture site is confusing and contradictory. Did the pediment remain blank from 1901 to the 1927-29 expansion of the building? I e-mailed BECHS in the hope of a definitive answer. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 13:43, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- Okay. Here is the deal about this. First of all, it comes from these guys. [1]. Now you would do well to ask, "So who these guys, and I can't find that info on this site anyway?" to which I'd reply, "Well. no, that information is on the "You need a password (actually, two) to find that info there, and those guys are okay and here is a section from their correspondance with the folks in Buffalo, who wrote,
- "Thank you for your interest in our building. Edward Amateis executed sculptural plaques that were added to the exterior of our building in 1929 and is credited in one of our publications with the pediment as well (1930): http:// -- tinyurl.com/45qbc5p"
Does that help? Oh yes, one more thing. Neither Amateis not Niehaus "carved" anything. That was probably done by the Piccirilli Brothers.
- "Thank you for your interest in our building. Edward Amateis executed sculptural plaques that were added to the exterior of our building in 1929 and is credited in one of our publications with the pediment as well (1930): http:// -- tinyurl.com/45qbc5p"
- Okay. Here is the deal about this. First of all, it comes from these guys. [1]. Now you would do well to ask, "So who these guys, and I can't find that info on this site anyway?" to which I'd reply, "Well. no, that information is on the "You need a password (actually, two) to find that info there, and those guys are okay and here is a section from their correspondance with the folks in Buffalo, who wrote,
Another fascinating factoid. When I tried to post this it turned out that http:// -- tinyurl.com/45qbc5p is on a wikipedia span blocked list? WTF? So I added two -- in the middle and you'll have to cut and paste if you want to check it. Life is just too strange sometimes Carptrash (talk) 20:33, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. That makes sense. The pedimental sculpture seems a bit too Art Deco to me to be Turn-of-the-Century. I'll share what BECHS says if they e-mail me back, and fix everything in the articles.
BTW, I notice you've been contributing to the Niehaus article for more than 6 years.[!] Me, I'm still a rookie. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 23:16, 14 April 2012 (UTC)- The curator at BECHS just e-mailed me back, saying that he thinks the sculptor of the pediment was Amateis. Their library is closed today, but he'll try to get a referenced source tomorrow. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 15:21, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- I changed "carved" to "modeled". I am impress with how many of the images I've added to List of equestrian statues in the United States are yours. Everything from Princeton, New Jersey to Prescott, Arizona. You get around. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 14:25, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
- The curator at BECHS just e-mailed me back, saying that he thinks the sculptor of the pediment was Amateis. Their library is closed today, but he'll try to get a referenced source tomorrow. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 15:21, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. That makes sense. The pedimental sculpture seems a bit too Art Deco to me to be Turn-of-the-Century. I'll share what BECHS says if they e-mail me back, and fix everything in the articles.
Deleted due to No release received at OTRS for over 30 days. If release does get sent then file can be undeleted. Ronhjones (Talk) 01:00, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- That was a really good picture that materially added to the article. Bad result. Tangible loss. This sucks. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 23:31, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
George D. Mason
editHi! I removed that sentence for two reasons: 1) the concept is already clearly expressed in the biography («In 1878 he joined with Zachariah Rice to form the firm Mason & Rice. This partnership lasted until 1898»); 2) the sentence is basically incorrect (Mason did not design all of the buildings constructed between 1878 and 1898 with Rice: as far as I know, for instance, the Thompson Home was designed only by Mason): as a consequence, I think it is far better if the list precises which commissions were in collaboration with Rice, Brush, or Kahn, one by one. Hope I made myself clear... Markhole (talk) 15:43, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 13
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eli Harvey, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Constant and Noble (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
More about Ivan Mestrovic
editDear Carptrash...Because the sentence is not the same...I put "one of the greatest"...That means he was in the top of sculptors in the 20th century.Probably one of the best if not the best..That's why i put ONE of the greatest...Not "the greatest" I even changed the sentence where it is said that "he was probably the best sculptor since the renaissance because for some the links "weren't too good"--Scrosby85 19:28, 14 October 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scrosby85 (talk • contribs)
Thank you..I always sign my posts but it doesn't recognize it...i don't know how...i try to sign my posts but unsuccessfulScrosby85 20:55, 14 October 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scrosby85 (talk • contribs)
Files missing description details
edit- File:Depew Memorial Fountain - Maquette.jpg
- File:Navels.jpg
- File:Rivalta Drago.jpg
- File:Embudo 1885.jpg
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:37, 23 October 2013 (UTC)The Bugle: Issue XCI, October 2013
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:21, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to the Reflinks tool
editHi Carptrash, just click on the "Reflinks tool" in the Cleanup-bare URLs banner. The interactive mode is best, because you often want to fix the code a little more. And thanks for pitching in on our editathon-- shall we put you down as participating remotely? You'd really enjoy the Smithsonian events, so come on down to DC, we might even find folks in the Chapter to give you a place to stay if you're interested. Djembayz (talk) 14:27, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- You're on the same page for the editathon ... :) Djembayz (talk) 16:34, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
possible
editIt is possible to draw me in to a conversation. You know this! I don't particularly care about my signal-to-noise ratio. You know this! Just trying to avoid the attention of any wiki-lawyers, who might recommend my offenses to a wiki-grand-jury, who might end up giving me six years in the wiki-gulag back east somewhere stuffed into a frozen barrel with a couple of exotic roommates. How are you? --Lockley (talk) 21:46, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- oh my Gosh that's awfully impressive! judging from the quality of your drawing you should... sculpt! --Lockley (talk) 02:12, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- yes now you know. uncultivated, I am. cannot play well with others. in other old news, thought you might be interested in this: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/modern-art-was-cia-weapon-1578808.html --Lockley (talk) 18:46, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Happy Halloween!
edit![]() |
Trick or Treat! Happy Halloween Carptrash! I hope you have a great day and remember to be safe if you go trick-or-treating tonight with friends, family or loved ones. Happy Halloween! ![]() Help spread Wikilove by adding {{subst:User:Dainomite/HappyHalloween}} to other users' talk pages whether they be friends, acquaintances or random folks. |
Harry Kitson
editPlease note in Henry Hudson Kitson's page, second paragraph already says he was called Harry.
The insertion of the naming of him only follows what he was called. He traveled under the name of Harry Kitson, Harry H Kitson Henry Hudson Kitson and H H Kitson. His name was never formally changed to Henry Hudson Kitson. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.228.20.11 (talk) 16:29, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- This is good information, but how do you know it? That Harry was his given name? A reference would be good. All the places that I look just say Henry. Carptrash (talk) 17:23, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
American Jews
editDid I violate any rules, or did I falsify history by mentioning Jewish American criminals? Why was that section deleted, its not as if I participated in the bashing of Jews, all I did was list criminals who are Jews with American nationality(only 5 of them, although I could've filled it up with a hundred or more, backed by authentic sources), consequently the crime section was deleted with the reason of "As per the Zionist lobby", when I asked why? the response I got was "orders, are orders" which was followed by a ban on me. How is this tolerated? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.49.101.174 (talk) 17:32, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- First of all, it helps if you register and sign your postings to me, makes carrying on a discussion easier. Then, go to perhaps White Americans and start a list of criminals there. This will demonstrate that your interest is criminology rather than jew-bashing. Then try again, but perhaps leave out the "killing small children" part, which is all I removed. But first register or sigh in. Carptrash (talk) 23:49, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- Also, if you put a link to the, "As per the Zionist lobby", and the "orders, are orders" stuff I can look at it and come up with some thoughts. Carptrash (talk) 23:52, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Click on the View History of the American Jews paged, and you will see it as the listed reasons for the page being locked. When I ask why, it says orders are orders, again on the View History page. Please take a look. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:104C:804F:14EE:DE64:1442:F1C0 (talk) 06:53, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 8
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emil Fuchs (artist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thank you for the useful edits you're currently making on the above page. It's great to see more information added to a newly-created page. Keep up the good work! --Storye book (talk) 16:32, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- It's the so-called "ripple effect." Toss a pebble into wikipedia and watch what happens. Carptrash (talk) 18:48, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- One of the most impressive things I've seen here is the teamwork which happens on big rolling news articles, e.g. when Michael Jackson died. It's astonishing how fast and efficient the editors are, how well the rules and etiquette work, and how smoothly it runs. I just watch . . . --Storye book (talk) 08:39, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- It's the so-called "ripple effect." Toss a pebble into wikipedia and watch what happens. Carptrash (talk) 18:48, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Nogales Court House
editNicely done! good to see all the old machinery still works over there. quite a thing, that pediment, and that finial looks store-bought to me, would you agree? --Lockley (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Red-linked?
editBTW, what does "red-linked" refer to in your comment at David Vitter?CFredkin (talk) 18:02, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
- Is the implication that red-linked users are those "who just show up to push a particular POV" defined somewhere? Or did you just make that up?CFredkin (talk) 18:29, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Also, would you agree that my edit which you reverted at David Vitter included the following comment: "Please provide secondary source to indicate significance to Vitter."CFredkin (talk) 18:29, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
So when you included the following comment while reverting my edit: "...unexplained removal of sourced material by red linked editor...", you were making a pejorative claim about another editor and stating something that wasn't really accurate. Right?CFredkin (talk) 19:27, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
That's quite a chip you have on your shoulder. Perhaps therapy would help.CFredkin (talk) 00:07, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Yes. Thank goodness you're here to defend the integrity of Wikipedia. I don't know what we'd do without your name calling and reversions of edits based on delusional rationales. I know it must be frustrating when other people disagree with you and you can't muster the gumption to make your case rationally. So instead you claim that anyone who disrupts your efforts to make the project a vehicle for pushing your POV must be acting with bad intent and use it as an excuse to resort to bullying behavior.CFredkin (talk) 00:44, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Since you have chosen to delete your talk page . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... again - which is where I was posting, I guess our dialog is at an end, but I must say, the HISTORY link at your talk page did make interesting viewing. Carptrash (talk) 02:41, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCII, November 2013
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:29, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Re: Little note
editHi Einar, I sent you a "thanks" note through this newfangled feature. It seemed to me that it was the simplest way of saying "OK, cool; I approve this change". I agree with you that lists should not contain red links without a very good reason. Graham87 02:23, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
November 2013 GA Thanks
edit![]() | This user has contributed to Paul Butterfield good articles on Wikipedia. |
On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I thank you for your editorial contributions to Paul Butterfield, which recently was promoted to WP:GA.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:04, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello Carptrash/Archive 5! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Women artists. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Women artists, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles about women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject Women artists page for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Members". I look forward to your involvement! |
SarahStierch (talk) 21:53, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library's Books and Bytes newsletter (#2)
editWelcome to the second issue of The Wikipedia Library's Books & Bytes newsletter! Read on for updates about what is going on at the intersection of Wikipedia and the library world.
Wikipedia Library highlights: New accounts, new surveys, new positions, new presentations...
Spotlight on people: Another Believer and Wiki Loves Libraries...
Books & Bytes in brief: From Dewey to Diversity conference...
Further reading: Digital library portals around the web...
Thanks!
editThanks for your kind words! --Neutralitytalk 09:12, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your advice! —Gothamscholar (talk) 23:27, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
December 2013
edit Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sideman may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * [[Jack Petersen (guitarist)]
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
nice work
editThat's a steady gaze if I've ever seen one. Kinda makes you feel like an uncarved piece of oak might feel. Nice work! How's it going? --Lockley (talk) 23:35, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- doing well up here! Just decided that this coming August, it's time for a strenuous ten-day wilderness adventure up in Washington state, with a plan to lose a few pounds, extend my range, and plan plan plan. Good to hear of your trip to Nogales. It might be the courthouse we're talking about, yes? --Lockley (talk) 00:36, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCIII, December 2013
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:31, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Civic Opera House (Chicago) and Civic Opera Building - now two articles
editThanks for your note on my talk page re: my changes to the opera house article.
The Civic Opera Building article title existed, but was simply set up as a re-direct to the opera house article. Yesterday, I had intended to do what I've just done - i.e. include the material about the building in the new Civic Opera Building article, since there is a lot that should legitimately be there. But, from the pov of the opera house, who cares about the "Tenants" section or the fact that the building was sold for $125 million, etc, etc.?
So, those interested in adding to the article for architectural reasons can now do so, though, obviously, there could be cross-referencing between the two articles. I hope that this makes sense. Viva-Verdi (talk) 18:40, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
edit[2]...Modernist (talk) 03:26, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
editYour upload of File:Angel of grief - York PA.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:00, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:Carptrash guiding Lucky 13 .jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:06, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 6
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daisy Bopanna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Abraham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
edit![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 15:47, 8 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Yunshui 雲水 15:47, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Carptrash wikipedia commons category
editHello, I love your photography! So much so that I went through all the files of yours that got moved to Commons and put them into a category. Letting you know here as you seem less active over yonder. Tried to avoid images that you uploaded there, or didn't upload at all, etc. Hope this might help with anything. djr13 (talk) 00:06, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Books & Bytes New Years Double Issue
editHappy New Year, and welcome to a special double issue of Books & Bytes. We've included a retrospective on the changes and progress TWL has seen over the last year, the results of the survey TWL participants completed in December, some of our plans for the future, a second interview with a Wiki Love Libraries coordinator, and more. Here's to 2014 being a year of expansion and innovation for TWL!
The Wikipedia Library completed the first 6 months of its Individual Engagement grant last week. Here's where we are and what we've done:
- Increased access to sources: 1500 editors signed up for 3700 free accounts, individually worth over $500,000, with usage increases of 400-600%
- Deep networking: Built relationships with Credo, HighBeam, Questia, JSTOR, Cochrane, LexisNexis, EBSCO, New York Times, and OCLC
- New pilot projects: Started the Wikipedia Visiting Scholar project to empower university-affiliated Wikipedia researchers
- Developed community: Created portal connecting 250 newsletter recipients, 30 library members, 3 volunteer coordinators, and 2 part-time contractors
- Tech scoped: Spec'd out a reference tool for linking to full-text sources and established a basis for OAuth integration
- Broad outreach: Wrote a feature article for Library Journal's The Digital Shift; presenting at the American Library Association annual meeting
The Bugle: Issue XCIV, January 2014
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Sources
editI saw that you talked about this music writer several times. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums#Piero_Scaruffi_-_Final_Verdict_on_using_him_as_a_source_in_reviews There's a final discussion about this, at the moment. Could you explain why here in a few words? Thanks. Woovee (talk) 18:42, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Talkback: you've got messages!
edit![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added Dismas. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Article Saved (song)
editHello. I see that you have blanked the article. Are you attempting to propose the article for deletion under WP:G7 because you are the only creator of this article? I have not submitted the article for CSD since it was created recently, but if you are, please note another editor or administrator, and it may be deleted through CSD. If you have not intended a deletion, you should be aware that the article may be deleted under G7 or many other numerous criterion by another editor. If you have a comment or question, please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks. KJ click here 03:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 8
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saved (Leiber and Stoller song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lulu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
WP Countering Systemic Bias in the Signpost
editComment below is reposted. Djembayz (talk) 22:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Countering Systemic Bias for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 00:52, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCV, February 2014
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 4
editNews for February from your Wikipedia Library.
Donations drive: news on TWL's partnership efforts with publishers
Open Access: Feature from Ocaasi on the intersection of the library and the open access movement
American Library Association Midwinter Conference: TWL attended this year in Philadelphia
Royal Society Opens Access To Journals: The UK's venerable Royal Society will give the public (and Wikipedians) full access to two of their journal titles for two days on March 4th and 5th
Going Global: TWL starts work on pilot projects in other language Wikipedias
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
replied on my page
editIMC.esq (talk) 16:37, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCVI, March 2014
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:27, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
March 2014
edit Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bonapartism may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- ] families; the latest one after [[far-right]] [[Legitimism]] and [[center-right]] [[Orleanism]].{ Both [[Boulangisme]] and [[Gaullism]] would be forms of Bonapartism.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
edit![]() |
The Copyeditor's Barnstar |
For your changes ln Milorganite (and elsewhere) you earned this. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:11, 28 March 2014 (UTC) |
Books & Bytes - Issue 5
edit- New Visiting Scholar positions
- TWL Branch on Arabic Wikipedia, microgrants program
- Australian articles get a link to librarians
- Spotlight: "7 Reasons Librarians Should Edit Wikipedia"
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCVII, April 2014
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:52, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Animals, art, and categories
editSorry, I made a mistake -- I was thinking of category:Art by animals, which is very different from category:Animal artists! I've undone my own change; thanks for bringing it up, otherwise I might not have gone back to double-check. DS (talk) 15:59, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Photo question
editWhere exactly did you find this image? File:Florek-wikipedia.jpg Was there no copyright notice on the program, or was the copyright not renewed? Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:33, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, I did a bit more looking and saw that (according to the article page) the photo is from 1969. That's too late for non-renewal to put something in the public domain, so it hinges on whether there was a copyright notice in the program. For better verifiability, did you see the whole program or just this photo? Did you specifically ask whether there was a copyright notice anywhere in the program? And are you still in touch with whoever gave you this photo? If so, it might be worth having them send an email to WP:OTRS to confirm that there is no copyright notice, or to give more information about what exactly they scanned. Thanks, Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:25, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 27
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louise Massey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hart County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Einar, the Madonna of the Trail is...
edit...cast in s composite stone called "Algonite". Worth an article?--Wetman (talk) 01:28, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Source
editThe consensus of January is no more. There's a new discussion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums#Piero_Scaruffi_as_a_reliable_and_published_source Could you write your point of view? Thanks Woovee (talk) 16:50, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 12
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Ellin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Hunt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Just checking, this is own work right? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:45, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Carptrash & Parducci work.jpg missing description details
editis missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:50, 15 May 2014 (UTC)Architecutral Scupltures
editI note from Corrado Parducci that he died in 1981. Thusly I am asking you to carefully reconsider what the copyright status of his works are. It was my understanding that post 1923 works of sculpture in the US were not covered by Freedom of panaroma, necessitating that their use on Wikipedia was subject to 'non-free use criteria'. A careful review of some of your photos featuring his works would be appreciated. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:04, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 19
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Hal Blaine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Tommy Sands
- List of suicides (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Mark Anthony
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCVIII, May 2014
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:43, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Image Descriptions
editAs part of an image description effort, some of your uploads may have add a Captioned as section added.
Please review your uploads to see if the contents of the captioned as section can be incorporated into the {{information}} block :)
Thanks for uploading media! Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- You could start by looking through https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AListFiles&limit=50&user=Carptrash Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:21, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:LB-FDR-Memorial-2.jpg
edit![⚠](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Ambox_warning_blue.svg/35px-Ambox_warning_blue.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:LB-FDR-Memorial-2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:35, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:LBAAHol2.jpg
edit![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:LBAAHol2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:09, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1f/Gettysburg_Battlefield_%283441626150%29.jpg/100px-Gettysburg_Battlefield_%283441626150%29.jpg)
I thought it would take about 2 hours to recategorize the monuments on Wiki Commons. Not 4-1/2! Well, it's probably 95% done. Still some dozen or so unidentified. -- BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 15:59, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- When I saw you launching into that, I thought,"Bravery such as that deserves, well, a monument." because the time involved is not a surprise to me. You have been doing yeoperson's work - of course I did prefer my picture of the Mississippi Memorial to your new one, better color and more dramatic, but, as the Mississippians learned on that day, you win some land . . . . . . .......... Carptrash (talk) 16:12, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- I like the drama of your photo. Is the guy with the rifle is trying to defend the fallen man or whack him? If it's the latter, your photo's better. -- BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 17:33, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- As I recall, they are both on the same team. I'll look into it. Carptrash (talk) 18:05, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- That was my impression after looking at it from other angles. The standing man is defending rather than assaulting the fallen man. -- BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 18:21, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- So you deliberately manipulated your photo to make it appear as if he was assaulting a dying man. Shameful. -- BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 18:27, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- That was my impression after looking at it from other angles. The standing man is defending rather than assaulting the fallen man. -- BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 18:21, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- As I recall, they are both on the same team. I'll look into it. Carptrash (talk) 18:05, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- I like the drama of your photo. Is the guy with the rifle is trying to defend the fallen man or whack him? If it's the latter, your photo's better. -- BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 17:33, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Well, I finally got thru all of SIRIS. Now people can fill things in with images. Do you know anything about the 99th Pennsylvania Infantry Monument? SIRIS and other sources list two iterations of the monument, but the NPS numbering suggests three. It looks to me like something from the 1964 World's Fair, so this iteration may date from the time of Gettysburg's centennial. -- BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 18:20, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- The first time I visited Gettysburg, I was in my 20s. I remember its being an aesthetic overload and well as a historical one.
- Take a look and see what you think of the format of the article. I think it works better in 3 tables (rather and 7), but I'm sure there are things that could dress it up.
- The best part is being able to generate the map of co-ordinates. It's just a start, but it will fill in. Generally I'm very happy with the article. -- BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 21:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7c/Gettysburg_Battlefield_%283441617160%29.jpg/100px-Gettysburg_Battlefield_%283441617160%29.jpg)
- Yeah, but note that the monument says "2nd Maryland Infantry C.S.A."
- I have a nominee for your phallic architecture page:
- -- BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 23:01, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- It was a surprise to me. -- BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 17:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- I'm going to have to rework the reserve regiments. I organized them under the units they were attached to, but some were state militias that kept their own identities during the war and erected their own monuments after. -- BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 17:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- It was a surprise to me. -- BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 17:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
As best I can make out from Martin's "Confederate Monuments at Gettysburg" there are 6 Maryland CSA markers, most, I believe, just plaques. Thanks for pointing this oddity out to me. Carptrash (talk) 22:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- The January 1, 1863 Emancipation Proclamation freed the enslaved only in states then at war with the U.S. I wonder what Lincoln intended to do about slavery in the border states. Until the passage of the 13th amendment, it remained legal in MD & DE, and legal but dying in NJ. -- BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 02:19, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 6
edit- New donations from Oxford University Press and Royal Society (UK)
- TWL does Vegas: American Library Association Annual plans
- TWL welcomes a new coordinator, resources for library students and interns
- New portal on Meta, resources for starting TWL branches, donor call blitzes, Wikipedia Visiting Scholar news, and more
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:BankofLansing2.jpg
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:BankofLansing2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:27, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: New Account Coordinators Needed
editHi Books & Bytes recipients: The Wikipedia Library has been expanding rapidly and we need some help! We currently have 10 signups for free account access open and several more in the works... In order to help with those signups, distribute access codes, and manage accounts we'll need 2-3 more Account Coordinators.
It takes about an hour to get up and running and then only takes a couple hours per week, flexible depending upon your schedule and routine. If you're interested in helping out, please drop a note in the next week at my talk page or shoot me an email at: jorlowitzgmail.com. Thanks and cheers, Jake Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCIX, June 2014
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:34, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 6
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of neo-noir titles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flesh and Blood (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 13
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Bobby Henrey
- added a link pointing to The Fallen Idol
- The Wonder Kid
- added a link pointing to The Fallen Idol
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, User:Carptrash, is that file in your opinion okay to move to commons? If you feel sure, you can move it, I guess. Lotje (talk) 11:43, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- There was such a silly fight about that picture - I don't care if it goes to Commons or not, though I believe that the copyright issues are okay. I have pretty much quit doing pictures because the arguments that have ensued are just a waste of time for all concerned. Carptrash (talk) 14:18, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- I flagged it.
Lotje (talk) 05:04, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- I flagged it.
Credo
editHello! You have received preliminary approval for access to Credo. Please fill out this short form so that your access can be processed. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue C, July 2014
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 7
editBooks & Bytes
Issue 7, June-July 2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)
- Seven new donations, two expanded partnerships
- TWL's Final Report up, read the summary
- Adventures in Las Vegas, WikiConference USA, and updates from TWL coordinators
- Spotlight: Blog post on BNA's impact on one editor's research
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Mayan Revival relief .jpg
edit![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mayan Revival relief .jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:17, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CI, August 2014
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
On the Pioneer High School (Ann Arbor, Michigan) article, I re-added Brian Rolston, and in my edit summary wrote: "re-added Brian Rolston to notable people; was I able to find a RS? No. Lots of almost RS's though (his school alumni association). Also, he lived in Ann Arbor as a teen. We're safe in assuming he attended this school; maybe someone will find a RS". I had ok sources, but nothing really solid like a book or article. Adding "citation needed" was to find a more reliable source. Maybe another editor had one? But you deleted Rolston, stating: "we're safe in assuming he attended this school;" is NO reason to put something in wikipedia. Ann Arbor has several high school options". Then in your next edit on that page, you add NNDB as your source for Ron Asheton, despite significant discussion all over Wikipedia that NNBD is a poor or unreliable source; see Talk:NNDB, [3], and [4]. In fact, another editor removed your edit and stated "somewhat better source". The source I didn't add for Rolston was certainly more reliable than the one you added. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:46, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Well my wife went to school there with both Ron Asheton and his brother Scott so I was not too concerned about the reference proving to be wrong. I would just as soon that you added something, but I'm okay with leaving it as is.Carptrash (talk) 01:29, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- I could care less. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:40, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Less than what? Carptrash (talk) 04:32, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- I could care less. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:40, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CII, September 2014
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election
editGreetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks
editCool image. You know, the Signpost could really use a cartoonist. I'm surprised we don't have one. Have you ever thought about it? Viriditas (talk) 20:58, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- It's a thought - though I just agreed to be a part of a major (or so it will seem) Corrado Parducci project so time will need to be rationed for a while. But I will think about it and if my thought overwhelm me as they sometimes do, who knows? Carptrash (talk) 23:37, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 8
editBooks & Bytes
Issue 8, August-September2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)
- TWL now a Wikimedia Foundation program, moves on from grant status
- Four new donations, including large DeGruyter parntership, pilot with Elsevier
- New TWL coordinators, Wikimania news, new library platform discussions, Wiki Loves Libraries update, and more
- Spotlight: "Traveling Through History" - an editor talks about his experiences with a TWL newspaper archive, Newspapers.com
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Done. Thanks for reminding me. == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 17:59, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- I saw the movie last night, and thought Matt Damon was the weak link among the male leads. It could have been better, kind of rambling and episodic, but sincere and hitting the big points well. Have you watched it? == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 21:30, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
- I got the dvd at the library but have not seen it yet. Having learned that my Mom enjoys football, that's what we do on TV for the weekends. I'll see it soon. I have a section on Hancock's war years from a little tome on him that I'll add when I .......... do it. Thanks for the reminder. later, Carptrash (talk) 16:37, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- I found a way to work Walker Hancock into Drinking fountains in the United States. Turns out his Zuni Bird Charmer is part of the Maschmeyer Memorial Fountain. == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 03:10, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
- I wish Monuments Men had been better. It's a story that should be widely known. Gloucester, Massachusetts had a Monuments-Men-weekend in September, with screenings of the movie and panels with the author of the book and Hancock's daughter. If I'd known, I would have gone.
I saw The Train in high school, but don't remember much about it. == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 14:09, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
- I wish Monuments Men had been better. It's a story that should be widely known. Gloucester, Massachusetts had a Monuments-Men-weekend in September, with screenings of the movie and panels with the author of the book and Hancock's daughter. If I'd known, I would have gone.
Angel of Grief
editYou undid my edit on Angel of Grief. That's fine. I don't care if wikipedia is accurate or not. You also claim I made an edit as an "unregistered user", and that's not wikipedia policy. Of course, there is no such thing as a reference for cemetery markers. I could post a photo, but since such a photo wouldn't be certified anywhere, published anywhere, or authenticated anywhere, what good would that do. Besides, I don't own the copyright on the photo, and I'm sure you know the ridiculous rules wikipedia has on photographs. The fact that my listing had as much backup as many others on the list, apparently is meaningless.
The truth is this, you, with your ham-handed understanding of the rules have made wikipedia less accurate. Congratulations. Live with your work. I'm not going to save you from that. Wikipedia is notoriously unreliable, and I have no commitment to saving it from itself. Have fun. 2620:117:C080:520:5E26:AFF:FEFE:8C40 (talk) 18:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
You also have to remove the British Columbia mention as well, if you are going to be consistent.2602:252:D2A:8B30:4950:3299:8672:B67D (talk) 18:22, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- You state that wikipedia is unreliable then claim the right to post an unreferenced unsourced statement. Do you see the paradox here? That you are are unregistered is a factor because I would have written to you before removing it could I have done so. I spend a lot of time trying to verify statements before removing them, I did so in this case as well. But I could find no such record. Notice that most of the other statures do have references. If you include a picture - if you are local to the work it should be possible, and the name of the person or family buried there then I'd have something to go by. As far as wikipedia's policy on picture copyrights, you'd be amazed at the pictures that people post claiming that they took. Perhaps if you took a deep breath , registered as an editor (or not) and did some serious editing, really get the feel of the project, you'd understand my perspective a bit more. I'd like to include your monument, that's what we are trying to do on this page. Carptrash (talk) 20:32, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014, Redux
edit
|
NOTE: This replaces the earlier October 2014 Bugle message, which had incorrect links -- please ignore/delete the previous message. Thank uou!
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
List of suicides
editThe pictures in the list of suicides seem to exclude contemporary figures. I just thought having some modern pics would be good.OnBeyondZebrax (talk) 22:18, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Not enough (said)
editI thought perhaps the Herbert Haseltine photo I replaced ("better image") was yours, but no. == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 21:16, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
- Better than wallowing in a list of suicides (said the half-Swede to the half- (full-?) Icelander). == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 21:36, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
- I met some cousins from Stockholm when they came to Phila about a decade ago, but haven't returned the visit. == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 22:01, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
- One sister spent about a month there in the 1980s, but none of the rest of us have made it. My grandfather was from Gothenburg, so I honor him by driving a Volvo. == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 22:13, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
- The present car is my 4th Volvo. The 3rd was retired in August with 251K miles and a book value well below the price of repairing it. My mechanic bought it for parts. == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 22:30, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 20
editHi. When you recently edited Laura Gardin Fraser, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horace Mann High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Perhaps we need to start an article called
editStatues to NOT visit on a first date, unless . . ..... Statues TO visit on a first date?
And while this might seem like both original research and opinion, what the heck. Carptrash (talk) 23:48, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- The Princeton wench must be Peggy Shippen Arnold, whose mad scene, semi-dishabille, discombobulated Washington and convinced him that she couldn't be part of her husband's treason. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 20:48, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- There's also War from the Sherman Monument in DC. A crone, if I ever saw one. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 20:56, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
hat
editIt is standard (and accepted) practice to {{hat}} sections of a discussion that are deviating from the purpose of the talk page. It didn't *hide* anything, and there was no "admin" action, just a warning from an admin. In any case, I think that line of discussion has gone on far enough, and it's off-topic, so I'd appreciate if you restored the hat - it doesn't need to be in the talk space for all to see. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 17:42, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Yes. This has nothing to do with "hiding" anything. Drmies (talk) 16:01, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Word to the wise, I hope
editThis was really uncalled for. If it was a joke it didn't translate very well, and such comments really just raise the temperature. I think you should know better. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 15:56, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
File:BorglumNCmonument.jpg listed for deletion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:BorglumNCmonument.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 14:49, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- By the way, I love your work, no offense about the deletion nomination. I've been moving your images to the Commons so that other wikiprojects can use them as well. Thanks especially for providing the year of creation on the monuments and statues; that helps immensely with copyright issues. All the best, – Quadell (talk) 14:52, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I'm writing The Encyclopedia Of Jerry Garcia Music Venues. I'm interested in using your photo of the Masonic Temple, Detroit. It's too small on Wiki. I'd need it at least 1 mb or larger. Please email me at slipnut01@gmail.com.
Thank you Harry Angus — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.7.79.9 (talk) 01:01, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Correction to de Weldon and sculpture work by William Bill Petsco
editWhen I read de Weldon's page I was appalled by the exclusion of my father's work as de Weldon's ghost sculptor and the lack of any reference to William Bill Petsco. My father spent 40 plus years doing de Weldon's statues, if fact I also spent two years working on the Iwo Jima statue at Quantico and the larger one at D.C. You removed my correction's with out contacting me. How do I add the corrections that I had previously made ? John Petsco Sr. SRPETSCO (talk) 23:17, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Relax John, I did contact you on your talk page about 2 minutes after I removed the section that you added. I will post what I am posting here there too. As I recall, you added a long section all in CAPITOLS. That would be removed by any editor who found it. Secondly, you did not provide a source or reference for your posting. That you know this to be true is not enough. We have editors that will tell you that they know that man has never walked on the moon. That the holocaust never happened. Etc. You need to come up with a source to back what you say. I am on your side. I am a sculptor historian and know that this sort of travesty happens a lot. let address it, but we must do so according to wikipedia's guidelines. Carptrash (talk) 23:58, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Naughty, naughty=
editIs this the raciest figure ever modeled (not sculpted) for a war memorial? I wonder what John Ashcroft would think. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 22:25, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
- As she offers her breasts, it just gets funnier when you read the inscriptions.
- Above:
- Iowa, her affections, like the rivers of her borders, flow to an inseparable union.
- and below:
- Iowa's tribute to the courage, patriotism and distinguished service of all her soldiers and sailors who fought in the War of the Rebellion.
- Most enjoyable. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 23:12, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
i WILL confess that I was not sure about posting this one, but, I didn't commission it, make it or even carve it. Just snapped it. I will confess thqat the pose is still a bit puzzling to me. Carptrash (talk) 00:00, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
- Who knows, maybe your photo will make her famous.
- She reminds me of Alexander Stirling Calder, whose statues sometimes got surprisingly sexual, but that was a generation later. Thank you for the Gettysburg equestrian pix. By any chance, did you photograph Frank Furness's 6th PA Cavalry Monument? It's a work I'd like to see better known. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 02:27, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
- Just stopped by to thank you both for the Equestrian list, but perhaps the AC, NJ Memorial is "racier," OTOH it's also gorier. BTW, they do a bit of dairy farming in Iowa. Maybe that explains it? Smallbones (talk) 19:06, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello Carptrash
editI am trying to imagine what you are like in real life: I think I have a good friends who are a bit similar, and I think we would get on! But honestly, Carptrash, you really, really, really need to stop with the redlinked thing. It just isn't productive or helpful or really in keeping with WP's philosophy that everyone is welcome. I do understand where you are coming from though, so here's a challenge for you. The person I know who might be a bit like is a poet.... he has a rich and imaginative vocabulary which he uses to express his ideas. The next time you feel like writing "redlink" or equivalent, try thinking of an equivalent - such as "inexperienced editor", "a newcomer", "newbie".... I am sure you can do better than me. --Slp1 (talk) 23:22, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 26
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of fountains in the United States, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rudolf Schwarz and George Brewster. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
GREAT photos! == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 00:00, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Accidentally suggestive
editI hope that's a chisel in his hand. == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 19:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Click on the photo. == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 03:04, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- I don't know whether you got my recent email with the R. Tait McKenzie piece, but like this, it seems overtly sexual to modern eyes. Could they really have been so oblivious 100 years ago? == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 13:03, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- I just sent the email again. == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 15:56, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- Yep. Try emailing me, and I'll reply. == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 16:55, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
New Wikipedia Library Accounts Now Available (November 2014)
editHello Wikimedians!
The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for:
- DeGruyter: 1000 new accounts for English and German-language research. Sign up on one of two language Wikipedias:
- Fold3: 100 new accounts for American history and military archives
- Scotland's People: 100 new accounts for Scottish genealogy database
- British Newspaper Archive: expanded by 100+ accounts for British newspapers
- Highbeam: 100+ remaining accounts for newspaper and magazine archives
- Questia: 100+ remaining accounts for journal and social science articles
- JSTOR: 100+ remaining accounts for journal archives
Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 23:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- You can host and coordinate signups for a Wikipedia Library branch in your own language. Please contact Ocaasi (WMF).
- This message was delivered via the Mass Message to the Book & Bytes recipient list.
So close
editThe Class of 1892 Fountain, with figures by Stirling Calder, is inside the arch at left, but blocked by the columns in this photo. It's a delightful thing. == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 15:21, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 8
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fountain of the Centaurs, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Staff, Robert R. Livingston and St. Louis Exposition. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:45, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Doughboys
editI can see the chart below the References heading. As for width, I regulate that by the length of the text. I know there is a better way, but doing this is simple (like me). == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 17:45, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- You had an extra dash before the final bracket. == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 18:08, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- Boy, have I got you fooled. == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 18:30, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Your opinion is needed
editHi. Can you offer your opinion in this consensus discussion? I know you did this last month, but it wasn't a formal consensus discussion, but now it is. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:21, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 15
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Sciences and The Arts Fountains, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bedford limestone. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:William Coleman Memorial Fountain, 2, Sacramento, California, USA, Ralph Stackpole, sculptor.jpg
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:William Coleman Memorial Fountain, 2, Sacramento, California, USA, Ralph Stackpole, sculptor.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:42, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Perhaps, perhaps
editWhat would be the best way to organize this: Rear Admiral Samuel Francis Dupont Memorial Fountain? == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 03:12, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- You are God on Wikipedia. At least until someone else edits or reverts you. == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 15:21, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, that bothered me too. == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 22:23, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CIV, November 2014
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
This should have a table with a column for images. It incorporates both architecture and art. Any suggestions about other columns? == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 14:28, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe it can be converted into a table later. For now, it's just a list with galleries for images. == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 15:50, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Punt?
editI don't know how to do it either. == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 12:16, 23 November 2014 (UTC)