User talk:Carolineholsten/Bajondillo Cave

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Ninasdraffen in topic Peer Review

Peer Review edit

I am pleasantly amazed and slightly envious from the amount of information you have provided in your article. I especially liked how you structured the "Significant Findings" section. The way it was constructed highlighted the main points, and then you went into greater depth. However, I am a little concerned about the amount of quotes used throughout this section. I know that certain quotes are allowed, but Wikipedia is not prone to use quotes in their articles. I would recommend revisiting Wikipedia's policies to just make sure that you are in the clear.

In addition, I was a little confused about the lead section. In the lead section, you mentioned a study but did not specify what the study was nor which scientists were behind the study. I think the lead section attempts to outline the sections that appear later in the article, but the information given in the first few sentences are too vague and this might confuse the reader.

My final suggestions would be to use hyper-links and include a picture. This article covers a lot of information and it may be hard to digest. I also realized the amount of work that I need to cover from reading your article, so this is great inspiration. Overall, I think this article does a great job of discussing the archaeological findings and the significance of those findings, which I believe are the key takeaways. Keep up the great work!

Ninasdraffen (talk) 20:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply