The climate change page was well laid out, with broader ideas at the top of the page and directing readers to increasingly specific topics. Citations were appropriate, though with such a heavily publicized topic I did expect citations for nearly every sentence, which was not the case. There were definitely some pieces of information that should have citations added to them as they are not common knowledge, especially outside of the scientific community. The neutrality was consistent throughout the article, which is especially important for as popular as the topic is. I believe it would be beneficial to include a section on "climate projections" in this article for the sake of providing thorough information. I think it would also be appreciated by readers who are looking for a comprehensive article that includes thorough but also socially/politically/culturally relevant information. Carl4633 (talk) 03:01, 6 May 2017 (UTC)