Carcjoth1, welcome to Wikipedia. Can I ask you why one of your first edits was voting in an RfA? Go Phightins! 18:49, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

It was one of the first page I read after creating my name and theirfore I decide to vote oppose Carcjoth1 (talk) 18:50, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

May I ask why? Go Phightins! 18:51, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

January 2013 edit

Unblock edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Carcjoth1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Invalid block reason. opposing a request for admin ship is certainly not grounds for blocking Carcjoth1 (talk) 19:02, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed sock. (X! · talk)  · @846  ·  19:18, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In case you didn't know, you are supposed to address the actual reason for your block in the unblock request. You were not blocked for opposing the candidate. You were blocked for abusing multiple accounts. AutomaticStrikeout (TC) 19:06, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
I assume is was because other user were suspicious of me voting on a candidate as my first edit. Either way I feel this block is unjust.Carcjoth1 (talk) 19:10, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Well, that and the way a checkuser identified you as a sock. Ironholds (talk) 19:11, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Prove it. You didn't even mention which account you think this is. Carcjoth1 (talk) 19:13, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Checkuser is proof. (X! · talk)  · @846  ·  19:18, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply