User talk:Carabinieri/Archive4
On you review of Coca Cola you said the following
- "Coca-Cola did actually contain cocaine at one point per se, which is a highly refined extract of coca leaves and was always far too expensive to use in a mass-market beverage. However, as cocaine is one of numerous alkaloids present in the coca leaf, it was nevertheless present in the drink." These sentences need to be re-written.
Could you explain why/how you want them rewriiten.--Natl1 (Talk Page) (Contribs) 20:35, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm just a minor and occasional editor and mean no offense, but diagree. Please see the article's talk page. Ensiform 03:27, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
History of the Jews in Malta / History of the Jews in Libya
editThank you for your response to my comment on the article: History of the Jews in Malta. I see we see things the same way. I will make a minor adjustment aimed at making the article somewhat clearer.
BTW I notice you also worked on the article about Jews in Libya. I wonder whether you have any information about a story heard that immediately after the destruction of the second temple, there was massive jewish emigration, and that the new emigrants successfully converted almost the whole Libyan population to Judiasm, and that the name Libya in fact signifies "land of the Levites"?
German/English translations for SS divisions
editHello. Wandalstouring indicated to me that you might be able to give a little guidance for translations. I'm in the process of doing some (minor) improvements to our articles on the various SS divisions, and, after discussion with a couple other users, determined to translate the orders of battle into English. You can see my first stab at this here. However, I have a couple of questions. First, is "detachment" the best translation for "abteilung"? And second, while I think "assault gun" is the best translation for "sturmgeschütz," the resulting "assault gun detachment" is a little clunky. Is ther another (better) translation? Any other suggestions/corections would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. Carom 17:35, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hi. Now this IS in my area, and I have left a note for User:Carom.--Anthony.bradbury 20:02, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
DYK!
editThank you for your contributions! Nishkid64 00:16, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Project
editMy name is actually already on the list as a member of Wikiproject Germany, but my range of interest only encompasses the years 1914 to 1945, and many requested articles fall outside that range.--Anthony.bradbury 19:42, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
re: Lucien Wolf
editThanks for the notice. you must admit, it was hilarious. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ddddd (talk • contribs) 20:18, 13 January 2007 (UTC).
Your DYK nomination for Barbara Plett was successful
editThanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 00:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
al-Kindi peer review
editHi there. I just wanted to write and thank you for your helpful contribution to the al-Kindi peer review. I am currently in the process of implementing the suggestions you made, and I hope to be finished in a day or two (real life permitting!). In the mean time, feel free to put forward any more points that you may have!
Thanks again! Alexander.Hainy 14:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
a Wilderness of Mirrors
editWell, thanks for replying, at least. I responded to your initial mark of deletion within an hour. I listed reasons for its inclusion on the talk page. In the next THIRTY SECONDS, someone else tagged it for speedy deletion and someone else erased it. I think that's pretty stupid. An article in good faith and well written, on an album that's in print, on sale currently, and reviewed on allmusic gets erased with no real warning and absolutely NO chance for the writer to defend the inclusion, while every single trivial iteration of childish cartoons, fantasy characters and video games no one has ever heard of get their own page. Not to mention that Wikipedia has (badly written, error-ridden) articles on every trance DJ and niche artist ever, and it pretty much reveals that Wikipedia is an essentially foolish project: nerds getting themselves off with the only power they'll ever taste. Anyway, that's me done with this thing. I can see now why vandals love this place so much. Ensiform 22:52, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I mean, look at the article on Nelson Miller, for God's sake! Why not delete it? he doesn't even have ANY albums! Ensiform 23:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Tacuara
editThanks! No pasa nada about the timing of response, time on Internet flies at a different speed... Cheers! Tazmaniacs 00:24, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Your DYK nomination for Virginia Foster Durr was successful
editThanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 23:45, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Ukrainian history
editPlease, review following : Talk:Non-German_cooperation_with_Nazis_during_World_War_II#Yarillstremenog_issue.
Thanks in advance for your opinion, it will be valuable for us. --Galkovsky 08:59, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Peer review of Prince Sadruddin Aga Khan
editHi Carabinieri. I read the valuable feedback that you provided in the Al-Kindi peer review, and I thought I might interest you in looking at Prince Sadruddin Aga Khan. I would really appreciate if you would take the time to read the article and provide your comments at the article's peer review page. Kind regards Cimm[talk] 02:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Carabinieri, I just wanted to thank you for the valuable feedback you provided on the Prince Sadruddin Aga Khan article. After considering your comments together with those of other reviewers, I have updated the article. If you have a moment to take another look, any additional thoughts would be much appreciated! Thanks again Cimm[talk] 05:31, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello again Carabinieri! I thought I would let you know that I have just nominated the Prince Sadruddin Aga Khan article as a Featured Article candidate. The feedback and encouragement from you and the other reviewers is what motivated the nomination. Thank you again for all your support! Cimm[talk] 00:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Prod at Mary Goldsmith
editHi there. You Prod'ded the page, and I took the prod like a cow takes a cattle prod. It's much more informative now, and I wanted to draw your attention there for that reason, so you can take a look. Next weekend, I hope to spend another hour or so on both her and his pages. Another user dropped the Prod for an 'expand' template after some of my work, by the way. ThuranX 05:14, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
New german grammar
editHi, how do you handle new german grammar ? Do you rewrite e.g. Veít Stoß to Veít Stoss ? Thanks. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 10:02, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
DYK
editThe Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007
editThe January 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Admin
editWould you like to be nominated for adminship? You have the perfect username, and more experience than anybody could ask for. If you want, I'll be happy to write a nomination statement sometime next week. Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 10:15, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- I can't guarantee anything, but here you go:
- Good luck! Don't forget to transclude the page at WP:RFA and to fix the ending time (seven days after you have accepted and the page has been transcluded). Kusma (討論) 21:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Detailed instructions are at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/nominate. Kusma (討論) 21:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hello. Pls chekc you email. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:19, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
WP:MILHIST Coordinator Elections
editThe Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!
Delivered by grafikbot 10:13, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
re: Ziocon
editVery good. I would have nominated it myself, but I wasn't sure that it qualified. MacGuy(contact me) 03:32, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
DYK nominations!
edit
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 22:55, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you!
editThank you for nominating the Anders Ljungqvist article for "Did You Know" -- it made my day! --Bonadea 21:17, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
An article which you nominated, Anders Ljungqvist, was selected for DYK!
edit
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 22:19, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Your DYK nomination for Carnival in Flanders was successful
editThanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 23:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
User name
editI'm leaving this note to signify that my vote against your RfA is not to be taken as a personal opposition. So I'd greatly appreciate your though after reading my statement. Thank you in advance, I'm sorry to cause this inconvenience. --M/ 15:32, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations!
editYou're now an admin. Have fun with the new tools helping to keep the project improving. Re-read the policies as needed and don't hesitate to ask questions. Be conservative with the tools, but at the same time dig in and help clear out the backlogs as you get comfortable. Again, congrats. - Taxman Talk 23:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well done Carabinieri. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 23:57, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Congrats! On the moppification, and on attracting such "interesting" oppose rationales! Alai 02:06, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks to you both and to all who participated in the discussion.--Carabinieri 16:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Congratulations! Use the tools wisely and make me proud! ;) Kusma (討論) 18:07, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks to you both and to all who participated in the discussion.--Carabinieri 16:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk-page speedys
editI'm probably not the best person to ask, as I don't do a lot of SDing in the article space, but I say "yes", as deleting the content would have made such a comment moot... Alai 19:11, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I saw you reverted the anon's blanking of their talk page and accompanying apology. I was wondering why? From what I've seen around there is consensus that users are allowed to remove comments from their talk pages, and the comment he/she replaced it with seems like a good faith apology for past vandalism to me. It almost seems lik biteing to revert it. I undid your edit, left an {{Unsigned|150.199.175.70}} tag on their apology, and gave them a welcome-anon message. We should probably keep an eye on them to make sure they don't start vandalising again; but still - I see no reason to revert their apology. Do you? ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 19:43, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Re:Winner Winner Chicken Dinner
editI'm not big AfDing legitimatly contested prods. I've always been of the opinion that if there's a legitimate reason to object to deletion, that I should watchlist it, and add appropriate maintainance tags. A few times such articles have festered for several months and I've afd'd for lack of sources and being orphaned. So, at this time, I'm not going to nominate it for deletion. i kan reed 00:35, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
I have proposed that List of German agriculture ministers be merged into List of Federal Ministers for Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (Germany), an article which you created. Do you by chance have the source for the content of the latter page (or are the ministers' articles themselves the sources)? If you could specify the source, I will perform the merge myself (the latter article is more detailed, but the former's coverage begins in 1919--30 years earlier).
Thank you, Black Falcon 03:51, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- The information was taken from the German language article.--Carabinieri 12:00, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you, I will use the information there to complete merge. Black Falcon 17:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Subpage Removals
editMany thanks to you for removing my pages with deletion tags on them. Very fast and reliable! Extranet (Talk | Contribs) 12:12, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi Carabinieri, many thanks for your comments on the ARF's peer review. I edited in accordance w/ your suggestions but for the one about "most politically-oriented"...it's because the 2 other main political parties (Hunchak and Ramgavar Party/AGBU) aren't as active as the ARF and they have mostly been working educational and cultural projects. I tried to include it but that would kinda go off topic in the header. I completed all other suggestions and am looking forward for your next batch of comments whenever you can read the rest of the article. Thanks again :) - Fedayee 22:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
You've been approved to use NPWatcher. Please give Martinp23 any feature requests or bugs. He'll also happy to help if you have any problems running the program, or any questions :). Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if he's made a new release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Finally, enjoy! -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 04:16, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Military History elections
editThe Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!
Delivered by grafikbot 13:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Leo Messi article
editHi, i was not logging in of late. Saw the following message of yours
- Way back in June you edited the article about Lionel Messi adding the following sentence: "Messi famously acknowledged his shortened initiation in international football before Argentina's next match against Paraguay saying "This is a re-debut, The first one was a bit short.""([1]) You did not, however, a source that statement. Could you please do so? Google only finds Wikipedia and en.thinkexist.com when searching for that quote and aparently anyone can add quotes to the latter website so it's not really a reliable source. If no source is found the assertion will have to be removed.--Carabinieri 21:29, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
I can see that subsequent to this you had carried out the said removal of content. My mistake not to cite the source in june; actually it is only later that we added sources to this article. However the the quotes were true and there is no reason for google to fail in providing the sources if searched with consideration. Here is one reliable source for you[1]. Anyhow since it is not a very important statement in the light of the article, I am not pushing the quote back :) --Su30 15:48, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for helping, but a few comments -
- please remember to update the suggestions page when you move things out to or back from the next update
- Act of Independence of Lithuania was created collaboratively in user space, and then moved to the main article space on 10 February, so it is eligible (look at its edit history); but
- Lyman Reed Blake is exceptionally short - I would replace it with your Aaron Clark.
-- ALoan (Talk) 13:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- OK, no problem - thanks for your assistance. -- ALoan (Talk) 14:18, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:The Wild Child.jpg)
editThanks for uploading Image:The Wild Child.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 20:20, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the DYK!
editThank you for the DYK on Guy Livingston. I really apprecaited it! Chris 01:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
DYK
editYour DYK nomination for Torture during the Algerian War was successful
editThanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 00:22, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks Carabinieri! You might want to see the message I left on Nishkid's page, but it's a good thing to see that such history subjects interest people. The recent affluence to the page, and remarks, made me do some more changes... See you! Tazmaniacs
Did you know is 10 Hours old
editDid you know is 10 Hours old. --Hirakawacho 10:19, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey... I've never done DYK before, I created this on the 13th but I put it in the 17th section. Could you look over it for the next update, if you're available? It's running out of DYK lifespan... Thanks. Grandmasterka 12:01, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
DYK
editLooks like you're doing fine, mate. Thanks for all the help with DYK, and keep up the great work. =) Nishkid64 18:17, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the DYK! Very flattering on an article I created. Yours, Smee 00:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC).
Dear Carabinieri: In the course of looking at my self-nom for this article, noticed that in [2] the edit summary says "moved to next update", but it never appears there. Did you change your opinion, or could this have been an error? Sincerely, Novickas 13:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- Did I pose this question in the wrong place? If so, please let me know. User:Novickas Novickas 14:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, Novickas 15:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
DYK
edit--Majorly (o rly?) 20:34, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for the nomination! Biruitorul 02:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
DYK note
editWhen you add the notes about DYK to the user's talk pages, please don't forget to add them for the nominator, too.[3][4][5] Cheers, Daniel.Bryant 06:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC)