Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 08:00, 29 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ok. I will not put it back. The DUP is arguably a fascist party in part due to their opposition to a referendum on abortion as the laws would be repealed. This is undemocratic and authoritarian. Canyoutietheminaknot (talk) 08:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

May 2018 edit

  Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Democratic Unionist Party. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 08:29, 29 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Sorry for not referencing it. Everything in that edit is accurate. The party is an abomination in terms of social policy. Canyoutietheminaknot (talk) 08:32, 29 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Canyoutietheminaknot, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Canyoutietheminaknot! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

June 2018 edit

  Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McSly (talk) 20:00, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply


Sorry. I will try to find a reference. Canyoutietheminaknot (talk) 20:02, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Canyoutietheminaknot: It's simple. If you don't have a reliable source to back up your change, don't edit the article. --McSly (talk) 20:07, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ok, McSly, understood. Did you know that Wikipedia is becoming a propaganda tool of the left wing mainstream media? This is because it uses them so heavily for references. It is the echo chamber. Tremendously disgraceful. Canyoutietheminaknot (talk) 20:13, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Kendrick Lamar. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. McSly (talk) 20:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at CNN, you may be blocked from editing. DanielRigal (talk) 21:26, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Important notice regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people edit

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Neutralitytalk 21:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

June 2018 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at CNN. DanielRigal (talk) 21:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

ok i will stopCanyoutietheminaknot (talk) 21:31, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Britain will never suppress my freedom! God save the queen (who backs brexit). Canyoutietheminaknot (talk) 21:43, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

If you think about it, brexit is ordained by almighty god himself!!!!!!! 😁 Canyoutietheminaknot (talk) 21:44, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please read WP:GIANTDICK. PhilKnight (talk) 21:53, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Well thank you very much, it's only average sized Canyoutietheminaknot (talk) 21:55, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

PhilKnight I have no intention of vandalising Wikipedia. Good evening from The United Kingdom. Canyoutietheminaknot (talk) 22:14, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

Between you this mess-o-crazy, this failure to assume good faith, this instance where you compare you being inconvenienced to the oppression of the North Korean people, this conspiracy theorizing, this unsourced accusation, this whitewashing, and other opinion-mongering, it's hard to tell if you're a troll or just incapable of editing neutrally.

However, since you apparently don't get how stupidly dishonest it is to forge a post by another user, the only reasonable response I can figure as an administrator is:

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The only way anyone would consider unblocking you is if you agreed to a topic ban from articles relating to politics and race. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply