Welcome to Wikipedia

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Canstusdis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! tedder (talk) 05:15, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Patrick Willis

edit

Your edit summary on Patrick Willis called my edit "vandalism". Please remember to assume good faith on Wikipedia. I was not intending to vandalize the article. I was trying to avoid weasel words. Calling edits that are not vandalism, vandalism, is not helpful. Kansan (talk) 07:43, 28 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Replied on your talk page. Canstusdis (talk) 06:47, 11 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

RE:Annihilationism

edit

Link MobileSnail 03:04, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks again. --Canstusdis (talk) 03:51, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Opposing Texts on Annihilationism

edit

Your continual removal of any annihilationist response to the list of opposing texts on annihilationism is unjustified and unfair. Considering that this is a Wikipedia page on annihilationism and that there are traditionalists responses to many of the sections on this page, it is fair and only appropriate that annihilationists have an opportunity to respond to the traditionalist position. Considering that some readers may immediately skip to this section, it is reasonable to have the annihilationist position on these texts briefly mentioned. Sven.ostring (talk) 00:45, 16 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Friend, this is a wikipedia page, not a justification for your position on annihilationism. Please follow the WP:NPOV and WP:REF guidelines. Thanks. ---Canstusdis (talk) 01:11, 16 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Original Barnstar
for offer of proofreading after Notzrim redirect is sorted out, will take you up on it. Cheers In ictu oculi (talk) 02:36, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I will be happy to assist. ---Canstusdis (talk) 12:17, 18 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Necromancy – Dispute Resolution

edit

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Necromancy". Thank you. — Apo-kalypso (talk) 05:06, 24 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Link to discussion ---Canstusdis (talk) 17:55, 24 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

WP:LEAD and good article status

edit

I'll start a discussion on Talk:Hermann Fegelein. Thanks. Canstusdis

Note about edit warring; BRD

edit

Discussed at Talk:Joseph Smith. Thanks. Canstusdis (talk) 01:26, 10 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notice

edit

In case you didn't get the notification, there's a thread about you at WP:AN/I here. ~Adjwilley (talk) 22:20, 10 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

With this edit you changed the text of a comment another editor had left on your talk page. This seems to be mischievous and could lead to a block. You pretend that a person said something that he or she didn't say. EdJohnston (talk) 01:00, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
C'mon, look at the date. I could have easily removed it, but the advice he gave me back then was good. I guess now I'll have to remove the whole thing. Thanks for your understanding. Canstusdis (talk) 02:31, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
I have added incident that EdJohnston pointed out to the Incidents board, as I disagree with the marginalization of my comments being edited like that. Additionally, per Talk Page Guidelines, archiving threads, not deleting them, is the preferred method. While it may be permitted to delete them, but it isn't the preferred method.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 13:53, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard

edit

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 12:58, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

After I notified you, I noticed that User Adjwilley had already started an "Incidents" noticeboard page, here on this issue. So the one I made is redundant. I have moved my comments to that page. My apologies.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 13:40, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

September 2013

edit
 

You have been blocked for 24 hours for edit warring at Joseph Smith. I am also concerned about some disruption on article talkpages and even on your own talkpage.[1] Please listen to advice, and take the opportunity to read WP:BATTLE while you're blocked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 13:50, 11 September 2013 (UTC).Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply