Your submission at Articles for creation: 2022 San Bernardino mayoral election (October 27) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 06:53, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Canofsoup1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:53, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello Mr. McClenon thank you for inviting me to your Teahouse I why it got denied honestly the San Bernardino mayoral election page is a mess right now so I will chat with you on the Teahouse thank you :) Canofsoup1 (talk) 08:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


  You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FYE31. Thank you. reppoptalk 07:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello reppop I would like to welcome you to my talk page I will look in to your inquiry as soon as possible thank Reppop:) Canofsoup1 (talk) 08:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello Reppop there a open discussion on having colors removed we would like to hear you opinion User talk:Canofsoup1#Removing Colors from Nonpartisan Elections hope to see you then:) Canofsoup1 (talk) 09:06, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


 
This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it has been used to evade blocks on one or more other accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock. To do so, first read the guide to appealing blocks, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} to the bottom of the talk page of your original account. JBW (talk) 08:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Canofsoup1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello I have been block for sockpuppetry I'm trying to respond I found out 10 minutes ago and didnt have time to respond can I have the opportunity to respond before I get block I dont believe my edits were disrupful I also put on my edit summary the we can talk about the colors on my edits and no one came to oppose my changes I dont think I needed to be block for my change I'm looking at FYE31 page right now to see what he did to resolve Reppops concerns I also noticed that Reppop also said hi to FYE31 on the 2022 San Bernadino mayoral election page I am not FYE31 this is my first time editing on Wikipedia I was going to set up my talk page tomorrow Los Angeles time with is today I'm looking at FYE31 page now please dont accuse me of being another account I do want to work with you to resolve this issue thank you Canofsoup1 (talk) 08:28, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This does not address the information in the SPI. 331dot (talk) 08:39, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Interestingly, this unblock request adds yet further evidence to confirm the sockpuppetry. JBW (talk) 08:41, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Canofsoup1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am being accused of sockpuppetry because I remove colors on election infobox another blocked editor by the name FYE31 did the same edits as me I dont have an relations with FYE31 I didnt realise that I was doing the same edits as FYE31 did I also put in my edit summary in quote removing colors as they're really no need for them or not partisan elections if you would like to have a conversation we can have the conversation in my talk box. No one came to my talk box to express opinion to the change I should not be block for having doing the same edits as FYE31 I didnt know that i did the same edits as FYE31 did I'm still open to the discussion on removing colors on Nonpartisan elections. thank you Canofsoup1 (talk) 08:54, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

  Confirmed and about as unambiguous a case as I've seen, technically. Yamla (talk) 09:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Removing Colors from Nonpartisan Elections edit

hello everyone is there any opinion to remove colors on all election infobox in I don't think there's a need to have them but I also want to here other users opinions :) Canofsoup1 (talk) 08:58, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Not for you, no. --Yamla (talk) 10:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply