User talk:Cameron/Archive/February09
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Guidelines 1. Use the new section tab at the top of the page to make a new section. 2. Be civil to me please. If I have made a mistake, let me know nicely. 3. Personal attacks are not tolerated on Wikipedia and will be reverted on sight. 4. Please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). 5. I will reply on your talkpage, unless you state otherwise. I self-archive this page regularly. Older threads may be found in the archives.Contents Archives UTC The current Wikipedia time is: |
B-star
An overdue thank you for the barnstar. I was cleaning up many of my own ref mistakes as well, and, though the article achieved GA status (well done!), I'll have to get back and tidy up the last of them. --Miesianiacal (talk) 18:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Elizabeth II's upgraded website
I noticed it says BRITISH MONARCHY. GoodDay (talk) 17:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Hiya Camer. You're a brave sole, to venture around that article. GoodDay (talk) 17:57, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- I liked the theory. GoodDay (talk) 18:04, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
"Armchair"'s comments seem increasingly bizarre, as well as irritatingly formatted and misplaced. But I don't think the IP was right to delete them - they should have been included under a new thread. Pretty immature ban-worthy behaviour from both participants, I'd say. Ghmyrtle (talk) 21:35, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- The problem with commenting on that page is that no matter what one says, you are damned if you do and damned if you don't. Just when you thought there was finally a consensus reached as regards to wording, someone jumps in and denounces a particular word, and so we are back on the same monotonous treadmill.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 07:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- C'est la vie. Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:41, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- It's like walking through a minefield on that page. One false step, and-BANG!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 12:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- The problem with commenting on that page is that no matter what one says, you are damned if you do and damned if you don't. Just when you thought there was finally a consensus reached as regards to wording, someone jumps in and denounces a particular word, and so we are back on the same monotonous treadmill.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 07:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Retirement postpond
Ok, ya'll convinced me. I'll merely stay at semi-retired, until I can obtain a laptop. GoodDay (talk) 18:25, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |