Speedy deletion of Belt Alliance fighter edit

 

A tag has been placed on Belt Alliance fighter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toddst1 18:39, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

The speedy deletion has already been declined, don't use {{hangon}}. The article us currently in the Wikipedia:Proposed deletion process. You have 5 days to fix the problems and remove the {{prod}} tag. (If the tag is removed without fixing, the article will likely go to AFD next. GRBerry 19:07, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
You pulled the {{prod}} tag without adding any evidence of real world significance. Please read our guidance on articles about fictional topics. Can the article be brought up to snuff to meet that guidance? If not, I will be nominating it for a community discussion about whether we should delete it. GRBerry 19:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply