Cadwaladr

Happiness (vandalized by sadness)

Thanks! It's nice to know someone appreciates my (positive) attention to detail. SalineBrain (talk) 04:00, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Salisbury Plain

Not bothered about the hyphen - if the OED says it's right that's good enough for me. Just doing a bit of troll-bashing. Pfainuk talk 19:34, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Sperm Whale (or whale)

I agree with your capitalization changes, but they will be reverted. For some reason whale names in wikipedia are capitalized. Rracecarr (talk) 05:33, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

O hai

This user <3's Cadwaladr, and his lovely box. Faulah (talk) 07:09, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Re:

It was intentional at first; I wasn't sure if it was vandalism or not. When I figured out it was (based on the IPs contribution history), I tried to self-revert (again), but huggle crashed. Thanks for that though. Knight-Lord of the Infernal Penguins 23:53, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Caracara

Just a brief note to inform you about a rename request made by me for one of your files on commons, as it is a Southern Caracara (the photo is also currently in use on your front page). Should you prefer another name than the one I suggested, you are of course entirely free to modify it, though I would recommend using something more than just the species name (this sometimes leads to conflicts with different files named the same on different wiki's). • Rabo³ • 16:41, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Re-reading above, I see it perhaps could be misunderstood. The identification as Southern Caracara is 100% certain; the White-throated is quite different (photo - adult right, immature left). The only issue was if you preferred to have it listed under another name than the one I suggested on commons (e.g. "White-throated Caracara - Chile", "Phalcoboenus albogularis - Puerto Williams, Chile.jpg" or alike). • Rabo³ • 17:57, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

All right. Perhaps I was mistaken. The name you suggested is fine with me. Cadwaladr (talk) 18:04, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Calmer Waters 09:09, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Baron Rothschild

Can you re-check your redirect - I think you made an error. The article you redirected is a general article and not specifically about 1 person. Thanks Denisarona (talk) 07:43, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Yes, you're right. I've undone that, but I'm leaving the redirect of Lord Rothschild to Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild because he seems to be the most notable Lord Rothschild.

DFTBA

Hello fellow Nerdfighter. What's up? — nerdfighter 01:12, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Papertowns.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Papertowns.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:21, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Papertowns.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Papertowns.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:25, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Cadwaladr/Userboxes/Pornography

User:Cadwaladr/Userboxes/Pornography, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Cadwaladr/Userboxes/Pornography and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Cadwaladr/Userboxes/Pornography during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 23:59, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

• This is to notify you that the aforementioned discussion was closed as keep. Deryck C. 21:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cadwaladr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cadwaladr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cadwaladr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)