Cable10291
Hello, Cable10291, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ahunt (talk) 12:52, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
AN
editSince the discussion there was (appropriately) closed quickly, and I cannot be sure you saw my comment, I repeat it here: People who have had accounts for 1 month should not take it upon themselves to enforce the cultural norms of a community of this size, age, and scope. Go improve an encyclopedia article instead. --JBL (talk) 20:09, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Too add, I noticed in [1] that edit your suggestion of using a [citation needed] tag; on BLPs, the correct action is to remove any material believed to be non-verifiable or sourced by unreliable sources. Please see WP:BLPRS. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 02:10, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi. WP:REMOVAL is an essay. It is not policy and certainly does not supersede the BLP policies. You're invited to start a RfC if it's that important to you. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 02:21, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Per [2], there was one green and one yellow source in that paragraph. Not sure how many sources you need. A single green source, should be enough for it to *not* be considered unsourced or poorly sourced. Cable10291 (talk) 02:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
It appears that Zaathras is continuing to archive the discussion that you pointed out they are not entitled to archive, and claiming that they "started it" as justification for doing so. I have reverted it again (it is my second revert on the page in 24 hours), but I want to avoid potentially contributing to edit warring (on my or their part). However, you were very correct in that involved editors cannot archive discussions. I just thought I'd bring this to your attention before it possibly gets out of hand (whether through edit warring, generally uncivil conduct, or any other breaches of policy). Thank you so much for your contributions. JeffSpaceman (talk) 01:36, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- @JeffSpaceman: Thank you, just read this now. It appears as if the user stopped, but if they continue someone might need to take it to the noticeboards. I don't want you getting some 3RR writeup due to the user in question pretending the rule (which you confirmed is real:Template:Hidden archive top) does not exist. It seems as if the user does have some pattern of ownership behaviour, so this may stem from that. I'm sure no editor wants to get involved in this type of stuff and would rather be contributing to the encyclopedia, but I appreciate you standing up for civility which is one of the five pillars. Cable10291 (talk) 06:51, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Capitalization at Brave New World
editHello, I have noticed that you have made edits changing the capitalization of "Black" to "black" several times at Captain America: Brave New World, I encourage you to read the edit summaries that I and others have provided in our reversions, directing to the prior consensus as allowed per MOS:RACECAPS. It is consistent in its use in this article, and where it is not reflective of this in other MCU articles, it can kindly be changed. You have consistently made these changes, without attempts to discuss on the talk page in the past few months, and multiple editors have explained the capitalization to you at least six times, with this most recent reversion today being #7, as seen here, here, here, mine here, here, and mine again. Please kindly start a discussion at the article's talk page before you go about making such changes in the future, as editors are more than willing to engage in conversation to explain key points and rationale, and repeated consistent changes may be seen as disruptive. Thank you for your time. Trailblazer101 (talk) 05:09, 16 September 2023 (UTC)