Hello, CREATOR34566, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 17:47, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priyanka Chakraborty (March 11) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 17:47, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, CREATOR34566! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 17:47, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priyanka Chakraborty (April 26) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:44, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Priyanka Chakraborty has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Priyanka Chakraborty. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:10, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

July 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm DaxServer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ramayana have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 13:16, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
Just wanted to let you know thar this book is based on the Ramayana hence I thought, if it's name should be mentioned. As that particular segment is meant for BOOKS written about The Ramayana.
I have seen that other name of the other books are there. Then what is the problem with this particular book? CREATOR34566 (talk) 14:16, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priyanka Chakraborty (July 10) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Numberguy6 (talk) 17:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priyanka Chakraborty (September 23) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Fade258 (talk) 16:13, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priyanka Chakraborty (September 23) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 16:13, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priyanka Chakraborty (September 23) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not to be used to WP:SPAM.
Qcne (talk) 16:50, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Priyanka Chakraborty edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Priyanka Chakraborty, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Itscreator123 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Itscreator123. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Spicy (talk) 22:24, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply