User talk:CLCStudent/Archive 71
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 65 | ← | Archive 69 | Archive 70 | Archive 71 | Archive 72 | Archive 73 | → | Archive 75 |
My edit to Wikipedia:Legal vandalism
Hello! You have reverted an edit using WP:Twinkle. But this is not as obvious case as you may thought.
The page Wikipedia:Legal vandalism is a page that humorously explains how to vandalise a page (of course, vandalism in not allowed on Wikipedia and bad-faith edits should be reverted as soon as possible). It's not an article. It's a page for jokes, because, of course, editors should not vandalise pages. But see the Wikipedia talk:Legal vandalism. The problem is that the page tells people how to add copyvio and libel to the sandbox. I agree with the editor who mentioned the problem at the Discussion page, so I have replaced the text with "How to add bad unuseful text" advice.
I know that the edit is vandalism. But: 1) this page has already contained vandalism (it's all about illustrative vandalism, not actual vandalism). 2) it's dubious that people are encouraged to post copyvio, even in humorous essays.
I think we should discuss the page now. ParticipantOfTheEncyclopedia (talk) 19:08, 28 October 2019 (UTC)