CJW9
March 2012 edit
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. The Rambling Man (talk) 14:01, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Claudia Schiffer with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. RA0808 talkcontribs 14:08, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:08, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:00, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
CJW9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I would appreciate if you would unblock my account. I understand now that there are ways of editing of which as a first time user i am not practiced with and realise i now need to look to edit smaller elements rather than the whole page at one time. I do apologies My sole purpose is not to cause vandalism of anything untoward but to solely update and provide far more accurate information regarding Claudia Schiffer. I am also hoping to reformat the page so it reads more clearly. I have been working on getting the accurate references, links that work as so many were outdated and constructing the information in a non biased informative way. I hope i can actively start editing again and i will approach the technique differently. Many thanks
Accept reason:
Alrighty. As blocking admin I guess I can overturn my own block. I'd like you to carefully explain the edits you propose to make on the talk page of the article explaining why, for instance, you wish to blank whole sections. Also, if you are closely related to the subject, which is my conjecture, but nevertheless a possibility, you may wish to read WP:COI. Note, while I'm unblocking now, any further disruption will result in further, lengthier blocks. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:47, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Significant rewrite - I have just applied a significant rewrite to Claudia Schiffer's wikipedia page. I have kept virtually all of the information that stands, unless it is factually incorrect. The reason for my rewrite is to give a better flow to the text, update the information including the links for the reader as the page is so out of date it was in need of some revision. I have amended the modelling and fashion sub heading to solely modelling as this deals with this part of her career. As she is now the creative director of her own label i have included a sub heading and information regarding this as it is import the reader is kept fully up to date with her developing career. As she is no longer an occasional actress I have replaced this with Creative Director to reflect her career status. I have also added a sub heading referring to her charitable commitments. Where possible i have tried to include new links as the majority of the reference pages were no longer found / working. This is extremely annoying and if a reference is cited it should link to something. I have removed references regarding having her ears pieced as this is not true. The reference link to this no longer works and it is inaccurate reporting therefore this should not be stated on the page. Claudia no longer holds a contract with Ebel watches, therefore i have also removed and i have tidied up the way the page is written as whole. I have done this to offer the reader far more accurate biographical information.
REwrite of Claudia Schiffers page edit
I have just applied a rewrite to Claudia Schiffer's wikipedia page. I have kept virtually all of the information that stands, unless it is factually incorrect. The reason for my rewrite is to give a better flow to the text, update the information so it is factual and ensure the links are correct / working as the page is so out of date it was in need of some revision. I have amended the modelling and fashion sub heading to solely modelling as this deals with this part of her career. As she is now the creative director of her own label i have included a sub heading and information regarding this as it is import the reader is kept fully up to date with her developing career. As she is no longer an occasional actress I have replaced this with Creative Director to reflect her career status. I have also added a sub heading referring to her charitable commitments. Where possible i have tried to include new links as the majority of the reference pages were no longer found / working. This is extremely annoying and if a reference is cited it should link to something. I have removed references regarding having her ears pieced as this is not true. The reference link to this no longer works and it is inaccurate reporting therefore this should not be stated on the page. Claudia no longer holds a contract with Ebel watches, did not appear in the Fart Party and she never appeared on stage with David Copperfield. I have kept the reference to their relationship but taken out the other information as totally incorrect. I have tidied up the way the page is written as whole. I have done this to offer the reader far more accurate biographical information.