CChatalova

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi CChatalova! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 21:10, Monday, October 19, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: Radical fluorination has been accepted

Radical fluorination, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- Ed (Edgar181) 19:27, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Secondary

Hi Claire, has anyone explained the concept of WP:SECONDARY? The idea if you haven't noticed the preference is for citations to reviews. Wikipedia has no aspiration as a technical journal. If you want further guidance, feel free to ask. The basic mission is to replace most primary refs with summarizing reviews. Thanks for listening.--Smokefoot (talk) 21:18, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Smokefoot. The topic being relatively recent, only one review has been published on the subject. Should I only cite this reference then? Any suggestion to improve the article is welcome. ClaireCChatalova (talk) 21:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Use your judgement. Maybe some of the citations could be removed by citing the review that discusses them. As a new editors, you dont need to get nervous, so another option is to just ignore my comments for now. Many new promising editors who know lots of detail, write like you do. With experience, you might shift toward broader topics, where you will naturally cite mainly textbooks and reviews. Happy editing. --Smokefoot (talk) 23:27, 8 January 2016 (UTC)