Back?

edit

So, you're not dead then? BencherliteTalk 20:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well, enjoy! Oh, and you're now a "rollbacker" - read WP:ROLLBACK before using it, though. I have a hectic week ahead so won't be around much, alas. Regards, BencherliteTalk 09:24, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Parc de Belleville

edit

According to ref 2 the park "also boasts the longest cascading water fountain in Paris, 100 meters long." Any chance you can work that into the article before I look at the DYK? -Mgm|(talk) 09:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Cello rock

edit
 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Cello rock. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cello rock (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:43, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Richard Aaron

edit

I have nominated Richard Aaron, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Aaron. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ƒ(Δ)² 16:59, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA reassessment of Guto Puw

edit

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found a number of concerns with the article which you can see at Talk:Guto Puw/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:RachelBartonPine.jpg

edit

Hi, I nominated File:RachelBartonPine.jpg for deletion because a free image might reasonably be found or created, and I think the file accordingly fails WP:NFCC. Best Hekerui (talk) 17:35, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Just dropping by

edit

Just thought I'd look in, check that no-one had trashed the place in your absence etc... all looks to be ok (although there's a fair amount of dust!) Hope all is well. BencherliteTalk 14:21, 16 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, CA387. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation

edit
 

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CA387, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Pkbwcgs (talk) 07:59, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:FMatthiasAlexander.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:FMatthiasAlexander.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of David Cerone

edit
 

The article David Cerone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:ENT / WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 21:46, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply