Louis Wagner edit

It is a dandy little article, but it is ineligible for DYK because it does not cite its sources. Circeus 00:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

P`ere Lachaise edit

I have started a category for burials there and will remove all names from the main article once the category is in place. FYI. The yet-to-be-added names are at User:Crzrussian/Sandbox - CrazyRussian talk/email 20:32, 15 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

de la Fontaine edit

Gosh, what about Heloise? Reburials were common... - CrazyRussian talk/email 23:10, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Menier Chocolate edit

How is Menier Chocolate "historically significant"? I've been trying to keep the list in Chocolate short, but if there is some special significance to Menier, I'd be glad to see it in the list. Meanwhile, you should add Menier to List of chocolate manufacturers, and create an article on Menier chocolate. Argyriou 16:12, 23 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Mary I of Scotland edit

I'm not sure that linking queen consorts to List of French monarchs is the right thing to do as they are, by definition, not monarchs. Could we please look for a better solution? Deb 16:31, 26 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Nice article on Mernier. Keep it upErnst Stavro Blofeld 18:43, 5 September 2006 (UTC)Reply


  On 6 September, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Menier Chocolate, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Where We Virtually Meet edit

It's the flow of History that has us meet this way. I mark the occasion with congratulations for your interesting contributions. It's a pleasure and a privilege.

(Lunarian 16:02, 12 September 2006 (UTC))Reply

Redirect of Rallye Automobile Monte Carlo to Monte Carlo Rally edit

Hey there - thanks for helping out here, but in the future, when you move pages, please use the move button located at the top of the page (assuming that you use the monobook skin). We're required to keep page histories together for GFDL reasons, and when you copy-and-paste articles that separates the history and thus makes the history confusing and also creates copyright issues. For more information, please take a gander at Wikipedia:How to rename (move) a page and meta:Help:Moving a page or feel free to contact me. Thanks for helping out with the 'pedia! Snoutwood (talk) 00:15, 21 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Survey Q edit

Have you ever been to the southern hemisphere? Respond here Deadline for entries is December 15th, PST. AstroBoy 03:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Non-free rationale for File:MenierChocolatePoster.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MenierChocolatePoster.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:34, 10 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Non-free rationale for File:PetitÉcolier-Bouisset.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PetitÉcolier-Bouisset.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:31, 16 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Exner Revival Cars for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Exner Revival Cars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exner Revival Cars until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 13:05, 8 June 2019 (UTC)Reply